On 6 Mar 2016, at 2:30 PM, Richard Frawley <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://flarm.com/statement-by-flarm-technology-about-recent-unsolicited-emails/
>  
> <http://flarm.com/statement-by-flarm-technology-about-recent-unsolicited-emails/>
Smells like bullshit.
http://flarm.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/FLARM-System-Design-and-Compatibility.pdf
 
<http://flarm.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/FLARM-System-Design-and-Compatibility.pdf>

"Encryption of the radio protocol is a consequence of the requirements for 
privacy and security and was thus introduced nearly a decade ago: It protects 
the system from abuse but also from rogue devices implementing the protocol and 
system incorrectly or incompletely. The latter may have serious consequences 
for users of proper devices since incorrect data may lead to undefined behavior 
on the receiver end. The encryption applied is an industrial-strength symmetric 
cipher, fast enough to be run on all devices with no performance degradation. 
Since decryption or interception of encrypted communication is illegal in most 
countries, this also ensures the integrity of the system beyond the technical 
barriers. Furthermore, the encryption can be enhanced with software updates if 
security is compromised.”

This is a half-baked technical-sounding justification for a restraint of trade.

Publish the standard, and have independent auditors judge compliance with the 
standard to award a FLARM-compatible Service Mark for compatible 
implementations. Devices that aren’t “rogue” get to advertise themselves as 
FLARM(sm), devices that don’t, don’t. Comps can specify that they won’t accept 
FLARMs without the servicemark. Then let the market’s desire for 
interoperability clean up the raggedy ends.

Using encryption to lock competitors out of the protocol altogether is going to 
be incredibly funny in a few years as soon as FLARM decides to stop providing 
software support to the 20,000-odd obsolete devices bought between 2004 and 
2010. If you want to keep FLARM you’ll need to buy another device from the same 
company that just shafted the device you’ve already bought. 

   - mark


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to