On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Mark Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we made one small change, i.e. pay instructors, the flow on from that > would self organise. > There is nothing like a paying consumer to figure out what is value and what > is not. > Natural selection in play.
That’s certainly part of it, but I don’t think it’s enough. Also need to make sure that the qualification the customer pays for is portable: Needs to be usable outside the GFA system, otherwise they’ll have to pay for pilot credentials all over again when they try a different shape of flying vehicle. I think GPC needs to be equivalent to RPL. The CASA RPL is effectively the “bridge” between different aviation disciplines. RPL holders coming in to gliders or vice versa should need little more than a transition training syllabus. - mark _______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
