“Its also clear that the GFA has little control over anything in all reality, 
except to write documents put some polices in place and hope somebody enacts 
them. Most everything else happens between members and the club management”

With that mindset, do you expect to get any changes to the L2 Ind Op 
implemented?

Those on the GFA board/exec who share this opinion should stop wasting their 
time and step back to let someone with some enthusiasm and a more active 
approach to (change) management get on with it.

 

“The good news is that there are clubs that are operating differently and 
showing great results. They do not appear to be constrained or crippled by the 
GFA as some would like to make out”

These clubs tend to have very good leaders who can make things happen. They 
don’t have the fatalistic attitude displayed for the world to see by the posts 
from GFA M&D (all but the last one of which have been removed at the time I 
write this) and the first quote above..

 

Ulrich Stauss

0421 151 412

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

From: Aus-soaring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Richard Frawley
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2017 08:01
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] GFA Negative Advertising and Censorship?

 

whats positive Mark is that it is recognised that most of the work that needs 
to done has to be at grass roots level, nothing to do with the GFA at all.

 

Unfortunately it is a growing weakness in our culture is to blame the 
government (or any upstream authority) rather than assume personal 
responsibility.

 

Its also clear that the GFA has little control over anything in all reality, 
except to write documents put some polices in place and hope somebody enacts 
them. Most everything else happens between members and the club management

 

The good news is that there are clubs that are operating differently and 
showing great results. They do not appear to be constrained or crippled by the 
GFA as some would like to make out.

 

And what is also clear its that just about nobody active on this list wants to 
do anything other than whinge. As an example, only one person offered to assist 
with the L2 ops change….(thanks Bernard)

 

Your last point is what many people seem to do on this list, only its with the 
GFA as their target.  

 

Lets all  please remember that the GFA is just ordinary people doing thankless 
volunteer jobs, generally with the interest of community foremost and trying to 
do the right thing within the constraints available. They are just people. 

 

As a pilot and aircraft owner, I find the whole GFA experience simple, easy and 
painless, works well for me and many, many others I know.

 

As I am getting a self launcher, I do want this L2 ops situation improved and I 
will apply efforts towards that.

 

 

 

 

 

On 7 Feb 2017, at 8:03 am, Mark Newton <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

On 7 Feb 2017, at 7:34 AM, Richard Frawley <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 


snarkiness???
its that what exposing some reality is called?

 

He has a job to do.

 

He’s doing the opposite of the job.

 


john might not be very PC and the way he expressed things could have been a 
little more sensitive, 

 

“PC”?  “Sensitive”?  Turn it up, mate, nobody asked for those things.

 





but there was also a lot of reality in what he imparted.  Looks to me like a 
lot of healthy discussion as one result.

 

The same “healthy discussion” that’s been going on for at least 20 years.

 

It’ll peter out into nothingness in due course, and the GFA will decline to do 
anything about it.

 

Then something else will spark its resumption in a year or so, and the same 
points will be made again.

 

This isn’t new discussion with unique insights, it’s boring, repetitive, and 
demoralizing to cover the same territory over and over again for decades. There 
is clearly appetite within the GFA membership for the outcomes that have been 
discussed here, but no momentum whatsoever within the hierarchy to achieve them.

 

CFIT.





I don't think he deserved such punitive and heavy handedness, and trying to gag 
a marketing guy of all people has to be red rag to a bull.
Shuttering a core social media channel does not look that clever either.

 

He’s a volunteer, doing a job he’s supposed to enjoy.

 

If he isn’t enjoying it, or isn’t doing a good job of it, he should stop 
volunteering and hand it over to someone else.

 

Using his platform to berate everyone else about how hopeless they are is not 
acceptable behavior.

 

 

  - mark

 

 

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
 <http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring> 
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

 

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to