Ok, I am curious

so a long, long time ago the GFA secured the exclusive rights to allow their 
members to fly gliders.

why should the GFA have exclusivity? 

is the below a loop hole to break that?

Has anyone tried to exploit it?




> On 7 Feb 2017, at 12:11 pm, Matthew Scutter <yellowplant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That was my interpretation too, and I'm still not clear on why we made all 
> the foreign pilots attending the WGC in benalla join the GFA to operate their 
> foreign registered aircraft with their foreign licences. I appreciate the 
> process was streamlined but I don't see the legislative requirement anyway.
> The poms capitalized on this and are now saying - come fly the UK EGC, we 
> won't even make you join the BGA šŸ˜‚
> 
> On 7 Feb 2017 12:00 PM, "James McDowall" <james.mcdowal...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:james.mcdowal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> My reading of Mosp 2 (the GFA operations manual) is that membership of the 
> GFA is only mandated for foreign pilots and Class A airspace operations. 
> However, the GFA Operational Regulations (agreed between CASA and the GFA as 
> per CAO 95.4) say:
> "3.1.1. An aircraft to which these Regulations apply must not be operated 
> except by an individual who is a member of the GFA (CAO 95.4)." which would 
> seem to run counter to the intent of CASR 61.1515 for why not say in the 
> regulation "must be a member of the GFA".
> This question is did CASA exceed its authority to include this in the GFA 
> Operational Regulations when CAO 95.4 clearly defines an alternative path to 
> glider opeartions?
> BTW reading Part 61 it would seem that a private operator of glider 
> maintained by a LAME and holding a PPL can legally fly the glider provided 
> you do not need the benefit of the exemptions of CAO 95.4 which only seem to 
> exclude slope soaring. Remember RA-Aus issues glider towing endorsements.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Mark Newton <new...@atdot.dotat.org 
> <mailto:new...@atdot.dotat.org>> wrote:
> 
>> On 7 Feb 2017, at 9:23 AM, James McDowall <james.mcdowal...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:james.mcdowal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Can anyone enlighten me as to which piece of legislation says a GPL has no 
>> validity in Australia?
> 
> CASR 61.145 permits flight in a glider without a glider pilot license under 
> stated conditions.
> 
> CASR 61.1515 limits exercise of the privileges of a glider pilot license to 
> activity ā€œconducted in accordance with ā€¦ the operations manual of a 
> recreational aviation administration organisation that administers glider 
> activitiesā€¦ā€
> 
> The only such organization is the GFA.
> 
> The operations manual of the GFA requires pilots to be GFA members and submit 
> to the GFA instructional system, flying GFA-registered aircraft maintained 
> under the GFA airworthiness system.
> 
> If a pilot is a GFA member and has submitted to the GFA instructional system, 
> flying a GFA-registered aircraft maintained under the GFA airworthiness 
> system, they donā€™t actually need a glider pilot license in the first place.
> 
> Thus the glider pilot license is useless in Australia. The credential that 
> CASA recognizes as authority to fly a glider in Australia is the GFA-issued 
> GPC, not the one on your Part 61 license.
> 
> Hereā€™s Simon Hackettā€™s account of what it takes to get one, by the way:
> https://simonhackett.com/2015/04/17/australian-to-usa-glider-pilot-license/ 
> <https://simonhackett.com/2015/04/17/australian-to-usa-glider-pilot-license/>
> 
>> An Australian ā€˜GLIDER PILOT LICENSEā€™ (GPL) issued by CASA (the Australian 
>> version of the FAA) is not a license to fly gliders in Australia.
>> 
>> Instead, the GPL is it seems, merely an administrative construct ... that 
>> joins the dots between an international licensing system (that wants to see 
>> an ICAO compliant thing called a license) and the Australian glider flying 
>> environment administered by the GFA
>> 
> 
> 
>   - mark
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au <mailto:Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au>
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring 
> <http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au <mailto:Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au>
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring 
> <http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to