Surely a "fair dinkum" discussion of all of the issues about Flarm would benefit from Nigel and others being there to allow discussion of the genuine technical issues.
 
    If they are not there, any discussion is prone to be highjacked by misinformation, myth and academic double negative navel gazing.
 
    I hope & trust that this Flarm issue is not being "managed" by our leaders, rather than having a genuine technically correct forum discussion ........ where that GFA Seminar would have been an ideal location to get right into it and give every attendee a full understanding of the issues ....... if there was time of course. After all we are only dealing with a way to reduce mid-airs, so perhaps several other matters are more important.
 
    Seminar is defined in the Macquarie as a "meeting organised to discuss a specific topic". Is part of that to be a discussion on Flarm ..... or just some presentations that mention the subject?
 
Geoff
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:02 AM
Subject: [Aus-soaring] More information on Flarm-reply to Wombat

Hi Mike,

Nice that the GFA are having this meeting, I offered to come and present
FLARM and ADS-B from a manufacturers and a developers prospective but they
didn't see it necessary. Strange seeing as I attend Airservices and CASA
meetings.

Nigel



 

The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages (which
includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It
is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the addressee any form of disclosure, copying,
modification, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on the
information is unauthorised. If you received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your computer system
network.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Cleaver
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:48 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] More information on Flarm


Geoff & others

Given that FLARM is a topic for the GFA Seminar with the AGM this
coming weekend, to be presented by the new Executive Officer John
Welsh (being a retired Air Traffic Controller he has some technical
knowledge of systems and separation as well as being a very
experienced glider pilot), but with Pete & Mandy giving a
presentation on their experiences in France as well there will be
some useful discussion.

However, if you want to buy one for yourself (provided a suitable
operating frequency is available) then just remember caveat emptor -
let the buyer beware - before a proper evaluation is
done.  Personally, I would prefer to wait until the research has been
done, the training issues identified, and the equipment compatibility
with other technologies has been developed.

But I doubt that it will take very long.

Wombat


At 15:59 14/09/2005, you wrote:
>Have just read he "Report from Friedrichshafen" by Dave Nadler in
>the Sept issue of SSA Soaring.
>
>There he says that Flarm is a not-for-profit organisation. I was not
>aware of that.
>
>He also says that 450 Flarms were flying at end 2004 ...... with
>2600 shipped since then (I assume this is to Countries he lists below).
>
>Based on his advice that there are 1200 Gliders in Switzerland, 500
>in Austria and 7000 in Germany and if the above assumption is
>correct, that means they have a take-up rate that may be as high as
>35% in a comparatively short time.
>
>But WE need to evaluate whether this is worthwhile.
>
>I can understand that there is an issue re frequencies and Dave
>mentions that as an issue for the USA, as well as Product Liability
>Insurance for the US, ............ but does anyone really think that
>it needs a great deal of evaluation when the Europeans pilots and
>owners are voting with their wallets.
>
>But I guess that someone will still argue, as they did recently on
>this forum, that Flarm shouldn't be adopted here because they will
>promote poor lookout practice ... and double negatives.
>
>Save for the technical issues ............. LET'S GET ON WITH THEIR
>ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION HERE, and try to save a life or 2.
>
>Is the GFA talking with the Insurers yet?
>_______________________________________________
>Aus-soaring mailing list
>[email protected]
>To check or change subscription details, visit:
>http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to