Yes, but gathering/collecting & canvassing for proxy votes is not as easy as 
direct voting in person or by other means.
Though I must admit the canvassing for proxies by a person or a group of a 
particular view on an issue might prise out more votes than would be usual than 
if left solely to the members.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: rquinn 
  To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:59 PM
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] GFA Board Term of Office


  AGM and SGM have provision for directed proxy voting.

   

  Redmond

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Mc 
Donnell
  Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2009 12:38 PM
  To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] GFA Board Term of Office

   

  Dion said:

   

    "The only problem is, it would be difficult for many of us to be present at 
an AGM or anywhere else where a vote would have to be put forward is person, so 
perhaps a way of mailing in out vote would be best."

   

  Clause 21 of the Articles of Association provides for electronic/postal 
voting, but only "at the discretion of the President".  (sigh!)

   

  I would have thought postal/electronic voting would be normal given the 
geographical seperation of the members.

   

    From: D S Baker 

    To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 

    Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:54 AM

    Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] GFA Board Term of Office

     

    In the email from Graeme Wishart which Robert Hart attached, the proposed 
resolution says:

     

          A maximum consecutive term for any "board position by a" Board member
          shall be five years
          "and shall be limited to 8 years consecutive in total"
          and shall apply except in special circumstances
          and where invited to continue,
          such an invitation being approved by at least two thirds majority of 
the
          Board.

     

    So, what's being said is that a board member may hold one position for up 
to five years, but if they've switched positions, up to eight years. While I 
think this is fair, perhaps it would be an idea to make it a bit more obvious 
that the eight years is a limit on how long one may stay on the board if 
they've swapped positions in the previous 5 years.

     

    It also states that an appointed board member is put there by being 
approved by at least two thirds majority of the board. As Graeme said,

     

          The intent [of Clause 12 e] of course was to ensure turnover of Board 
members and to prevent
          featherbedding, stagnation and empire building.

     

    If board members are the only ones allowed to vote for other board members, 
then they could well easily keep each other in for as long as possible. Hence, 
I'm agreeing with others out there that it should be the GFA members who vote 
for board members. The only problem is, it would be difficult for many of us to 
be present at an AGM or anywhere else where a vote would have to be put forward 
is person, so perhaps a way of mailing in out vote would be best.

     

    Just my thoughts on it is all.

     

    Dion Baker


    <timmo> you know what i hate
    <timmo> errors that wont go away
    <Guilty> So you dislike children too



    2009/3/24 Glenn McLean <[email protected]>

    Robert,

    GFA Board members,- Politicians and nappies should all be changed 
regularly--for the same reason.

    I do not agree that any terms of office should be extended.

    Glenn

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Robert Hart 

      To: Soaring in Australia 

      Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:29 PM

      Subject: [Aus-soaring] GFA Board Term of Office

       

      HI folks

      You may be aware that the current GFA constitution limits Board member 
terms to a maximum of 5 consecutive years. There are quite a number of current 
Board members who are approaching that limit.

      There is now a proposal to change that limit from 5 years to 8 years - as 
noted below, although this will require a change in our articles (which can 
only be done at a special GM or AGM).

      We need to think about this issue and determine our position.

      The arguments for the change are given in the email below. There is 
however the other side of the debate.

      One of the reasons that it is so difficult to find volunteers is that 
those who do join the Board or take on administrative roles fairly rapidly find 
the frustrations of the current system too great to bear - and they withdraw. 
The experience of quite a number of GQ personnel over quite some time 
illustrates this problem.

      To extend the term of office of individuals to 8 years would further 
cement the position of those holding office who do not have to face the 
membership in a direct election (the President, Vice President, Treasurer and 
the chairs of the major committees).

      I believe that extending the maximum term of office would be acceptable 
were the articles changed as follows at the same time:-

        1.. the President, Vice President and Treasurer were subject to annual 
election by the membership at large. 
        2.. the Board level voting rights of the chairs of Operations, 
Airworthiness, Marketing and Development and Sports were removed. These 
positions should be policy advisors to the Board and on the Executive, 
actioning the policies set by the Board. They should not, however, be setting 
Board policy as this places them in the position of advising on, determining 
and actioning policy, which is generally held to be not be desirable. 
      If these changes were implemented, I do not believe that a limitation of 
service would be necessary as the entire Board would be subject to annual 
election, a process that would allow the membership to remove those deemed to 
have passed their use by date.

      Looking forward to an interesting debate! Over to you...




-- Robert Hart                                  [email protected]+61 
(0)438 385 533                           http://www.hart.wattle.id.au

          

       
      -------- Original Message --------

            Subject: 
           TERM OF OFFICE
           
            Date: 
           Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:01:46 +0900
           
            From: 
           Graeme Wishart <[email protected]>
           
            To: 
           <[email protected]>
           

       

Hi Everyone, At our Board meeting on Saturday 28th February the President 
listed item 4.5Term of Office on the agenda for discussion. Listed were current 
Board members whose term in office would soon create anissue with Clause 12(e) 
of our Articles.This circumstance has occurred as a result of the new Board 
being recentlyestablished in 2005. The clause states: 12 e) A maximum 
consecutive term for any Board member shall be five years and shall apply 
except in special circumstances and where invited to continue, such an 
invitation being approved by at least two thirds majority of theBoard. This is 
an explicit statement that restricts any Board member to a maximumof 5 
consecutive years regardless of position.The intent of course was to ensure 
turnover of Board members and to preventfeatherbedding, stagnation and empire 
building.There is no disagreement with the intent, however the reality is 
different. Individual members may come to the Board through more than one route 
and bygaining experience undertake several roles resulting in a period 
ofcontinuous representation that would preclude them from taking on adifferent 
or more senior role on the Board. For example a member may represent a region 
for 2 years, take on treasurerfor 2 years, Vice-President for 1 year and then 
be precluded from nominatingfor President. That representitive may be the only 
person willing tonominate or be the most suitable nomination. Or 3 years as 
Chairman of a Department, 2 years as Vice-president and thenalso be 
precludedfrom nominating for President, or any other position. In each case 
special circumstances may apply, however these "specialcircumstances"will 
inevitably become a common occurrence outside the intent of 
specialcircumstances. We now have a situation whereby the clause needs to be 
amended at the nextAGM to allow freedomand flexibility for members to nominate 
for positions on the Board and stillmeet the spirit of the intent of the 
clause.The unintended consequences of the current limitation is that it does 
notallow a period of training, exposure and familiarisation at the highestlevel 
of GFA management. Volunteers are generally in short supply andmembers willing 
to commit to management and administrative roles are alwaysin demand. After 
discussion at the Board meeting there was general consensus that theclause 
needed to be revisedto reflect reality and still meet the spirit of intent.The 
only issue to be resolved is the exact wording of the amendment. May we start 
with this recommendation and come to a resolution byconsultation.PROPOSAL12 e) 
A maximum consecutive term for any "board position by a" Board membershall be 
five years "and shall be limited to 8 years consecutive in total" and shall 
apply except in special circumstances and where invited to continue, such an 
invitation being approved by at least two thirds majority of theBoard. Under 
this proposition a Board member could be on the Board for aconsecutive 8 years 
in various roles for example:Regional representative member 2 years, Department 
chairman 2 years,President 4 years. (or variations and computations thereof)On 
this basis there should still be a reasonable turnover of representativesover 
the 12 board positions over time. This amendment will need to be advertised in 
sufficient time for the nextAGM on 12 Sept 2009.Alterations to Articles and 
notice of AGM requires 21 days notice (21 August2009 at the latest)and in 
addition Clause 23a) requires a notice to the Secretary with 21signatures (1 + 
20). Please return comments to me for compilation. Regards Graeme      




-- Robert Hart                                  [email protected]+61 
(0)438 385 533                           http://www.hart.wattle.id.au  

      __________ NOD32 3953 (20090321) Information __________

      This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
      http://www.eset.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      _______________________________________________
      Aus-soaring mailing list
      [email protected]
      To check or change subscription details, visit:
      http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


      __________ NOD32 3953 (20090321) Information __________

      This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
      http://www.eset.com


    _______________________________________________
    Aus-soaring mailing list
    [email protected]
    To check or change subscription details, visit:
    http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    Aus-soaring mailing list
    [email protected]
    To check or change subscription details, visit:
    http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  [email protected]
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to