Hi Jeff

Thank you and belatedly to Ian. That confirms exactly what I was thinking
regarding the length. I just was not sure that my conclusions were correct.



Cheers

Paul


On 17 April 2011 20:47, Jeff Farrow <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Paul I attach an email that Ian McPhee sent to this list last year. An
> explanaation for the discrepancy.  Jeff Farrow
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ian Mc Phee
> *Sent:* Thursday, 10 December 2009 8:24 AM
> *To:* Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> *Subject:* [Aus-soaring] many OZFLARM comm (stick) aerials in use may well
> be the wrong aerial (far too short)
>
> Been troubled by some lack of performance in OZFLARMS for some time now and
> only yesterday after talking to Mark Fisher realised many of the stick
> communication aerials on OZFLARMS may well be wrong frequency. I do know 4
> in our club are wrong length and the fifth glider has one of those Mobile
> one long range aerial which gives you green LEDs well beyong what the eye
> can see even 4 to 5 km!!!
>
> My calculation for 900mhz is the 1/4 wave aerial 75 to 80mm long.  At our
> club 4 the little white aerial say 40 mm long - far too short.  It would
> seem the little person in China threw all the say 900MHz and either 1800 or
> 2400MHz aerials in the one box as they looks the same on the outside.
>
> *I urge as many people as possible this weekend pop the rubber cover off
> the aerial and inspect the inside aerial length*  I am predicting 50% of
> the aerials will be the wrong length - far too short. Job will take less
> than 1 minute.  It would be easy to add a little copper wire of the right
> length
>
> While on Flarms etc I can say GPS (flat aerial) are best placed 25cm apart
> as the GPSs can interfer with each other.
>
> Also in motorglider if you are using the engine battery I would suggest
> fitting a 22000uF capicator in the power lead near flarm
>
> I will be very interested to hear the results of the aerial wore length
>
> Ian McPhee
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.717 / Virus Database: 270.14.116/2580 - Release Date: 12/22/09
> 06:13:00
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Paul Bart <[email protected]>
> *To:* Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in 
> Australia.<[email protected]>; Chat
> DDSC <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 17, 2011 12:31 PM
> *Subject:* [Aus-soaring] Antena length for Oz Flarm
>
> Hi
>
> I have become concerned that the range at which my Flarm detects gliders is
> not anywhere near specification. It often bypasses the green warning, going
> straight to red. I understand that there are many factors in play, such as
> shielding from the instrument panel, carbon etc., but I do not think that
> this is the explanation in my case. So I thought I would invest in a better
> antenna, but before I did that I had a look at the standard antenna
> provided. When I removed the plastic covering I was surprised that the
> actual antenna was only 48 mm long. Yet the manual states, that the antenna
> at 1/4 wavelength should be 86 mm long. I also have the original Swiss Flarm
> (inherited from a glider purchase from Europe) so I compared and its antenna
> is approximately 80 mm, but as the cover is not removable, I cannot confirm
> the length of the actual conductor.
>
> Anyway I had a look at a few wavelength calculators on the web and given
> the average frequency the Oz Flarm operates on is about 921MHz, the 1/4
> wavelength should be approximately 77mm and not the 86 indicated in the
> manual. I haste to add here that I know next to nothing about antenna
> design, so a simple application of the formula might not be correct.
>
> In any case though, the length of the antenna on my Flarm is 48 mm, well
> short of the manual stated 86 mm.
>
> So I would like to ask those that know more then I on this topic
> 1) Is 48 mm the correct length (too long for 1/8 and too short for 1/4
> wavelength)
> 2) If not, should it be 86mm as per manual, or 77mm as per calculated
> length
> 3) If mine is NOT an isolated case and the 45 mm length is not correct, are
> we having a fleet of Flarms out there with much poorer range and hence
> effectiveness that we should have.
>
> Any help on the topic greatly appreciated
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to