Yeah a Luddite!
On 9 January 2014 11:58, Ross McLean <[email protected]> wrote: > *Ron Sanders said:* > > *"* I also understand that this sounds like that rambling and digressions > of an old man but the encroachment of computers and worse our blind faith > in them is insidious." > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > *The Dictionary says:* > > *re·ac·tion·ar·y* (r[image: http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/emacr.gif]-[image: > http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/abreve.gif]k[image: > http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gif]sh[image: > http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gif]-n[image: > http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/ebreve.gif]r[image: > http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/lprime.gif][image: > http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/emacr.gif]) > > *adj.* > > Characterized by reaction, especially opposition to progress or > liberalism; extremely conservative. > > *n.* *pl.* *re·ac·tion·ar·ies* > > An opponent of progress or liberalism; an extreme conservative. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Sanders > Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2014 1:08 PM > To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Turnpoints > > > > Dear Matt, > > > > COONAM IS different from COONAB. > > > > I use a volkslogger so I know. > > > > It is interesting as to how many responses a simple question gets! > > I have a small preference for names rather than numbers, my understanding > of the geography of the world IS based on names rather than numbers but I > am absolutely tired if being dictated to by the limits of the computer > world. It was interesting to watch the breifings at the recent nationals, > the first Aussie comp I have attended for years, to note that it was almost > a prerequisite that you had done you own prior briefing using the same > tools as the organisation did. I just compared this to the old school type > like I received recently at the South African nationals from Sven Olivier > and like I used to receive from dear Alan Woolley. The guys took in all the > data they had available to them and then using their local knowledge and > experience gave a good high probability FORECAST. > > I definitely understand that my time has been and gone but I believe in > the basics and basically the accident of Asiana recently and the notorious > Air France 447 should never have happened. Basically you push the trust > levers forward if you want to go faster, funny it is a bit like putting > your foot on the accelerator. I also understand that this sounds like that > rambling and digressions of an old man but the encroachment of computers > and worse our blind faith in them is insidious. > > > > See ya later > > > > > > > > On 9 January 2014 06:39, Matt Gage <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My understanding was that the official turn point list was now the > > > file supplied by the organisers anyway. This is usually a small subset > > > of the local database without points close together. > > > > > > Even with a lack of multiple points in the same location, there is > > > scope for confusion. I am aware of someone entering COONAMBLE into a > > > task instead of COONABARABRAN as the device only showed the first 6 > > > characters ! And then they flew the wrong task. > > > > > > From experience, entering a task using the numbers is far quicker and > > > far less error prone, particularly if having to do it in the air > > > (after my oudie crashed and lost the task), which means less time with > head in the cockpit ! > > > > > > As far as getting an idea of what the task is, that is available from > > > the task sheet and by drawing it on a map. > > > > > > Remember, the task is for the benefit of the competitors. The fact > > > that any of us looking from home, work, etc can see what they are doing > is a bonus. > > > We should NEVER look to define tasks for the benefit of "spectators" > > > ahead of the competitors. > > > > > > I was actually opposed to this change until I got to use the new names > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > On 8 Jan 2014, at 19:29 , Ross McLean <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Oh Mike, the probability for error goes through the roof when you have > > > to enter the actual Lat and Long of the turn points. I think you must > > > have your tongue firmly planted in your cheek on that answer. LOL > > > > > > ROSS > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ___________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Mike > > > Borgelt > > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014 11:37 AM > > > To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. > > > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Turnpoints > > > > > > > > > > > > Presumably the turnpoint comes with the lat and long on the official > list. > > > That removes any ambiguity. > > > > > > So, no, you don't have a point in the days of GPS and databases. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > At 11:29 AM 8/01/2014, you wrote: > > > > > > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > > > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0191_01CF0C64.EE24B640" > > > Content-Language: en-au > > > > > > " How is having a name instead of a number likely to lead to more > > > confusion in the official contest turnpoint database or which turnpoint > has been set?" > > > > > > · Jandowie, Jandowie North, Jandowie Crossing > > > · Bobedah Town Hall, Bobedah Road Junc > > > · Boggabilla, Boggabri > > > · Carinda East, Carinda Swim Pool > > > · Collie A/F, Collie Road Junc > > > · Condobolin TerminlBldng, Condobolin Silo > > > · Coonabarabran, Coonabarabran Silo > > > · Coonamble TerminlBldng, Coonamble Silo, Coonamble West > > > · Forbes A/F, Forbes Silo > > > · Gilgandra A/F, Gilgandra TerminlBldng, Gilgandra Beehive Silo > > > · Temora A/F, Temora Silo > > > · Tomingley Road Junction, Tomingley West > > > (Silo)........................................... > > > > > > I could go on but you probably get the idea by now Mike. > > > ROSS > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ___________________ > > > > > > From: [email protected] [ > > > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Mike > > > Borgelt > > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014 10:45 AM > > > To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. > > > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Turnpoints > > > > > > Depends on the device and how the database is organised and how you > > > choose turnpoints. > > > > > > How is having a name instead of a number likely to lead to more > > > confusion in the official contest turnpoint database or which turnpoint > has been set? > > > > > > Presumably the names are spelled correctly and the coordinates > > > supplied by the organisers. > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > .At 10:30 AM 8/01/2014, you wrote: > > > > > > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > > > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0162_01CF0C5C.A9DFE160" > > > Content-Language: en-au > > > > > > From a competitor's point of view the new turnpoint naming convention > > > of number/name is great as it avoids any possible confusion regarding > > > which turnpoint has been set for the task. Also makes it much easier > > > to input the task accurately into the logger/flight computer/gps > > > whatever. Similarly, in the air they are really much easier and faster > to use. > > > ROSS > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ___________________ > > > > > > From: [email protected] [ > > > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Mandy > > > Temple > > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014 9:45 AM > > > To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' > > > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Turnpoints > > > > > > The names are a combined number and name, not just a number. > > > eg 47PATA > > > MT > > > > > > From: [email protected] [ > > > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Mike > > > Borgelt > > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014 8:49 AM > > > To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. > > > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Turnpoints > > > > > > With the added advantage that casual visitors to the contest have no > > > idea where the task is for the day :-) > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > At 07:06 PM 7/01/2014, you wrote: > > > Hi Ron, apparently it was requested by the pilots at a recent nats > > > pilot meeting (maybe Benalla) and is now in the guidelines. Makes > > > inputting tasks to a device easier. > > > > > > Regards Grant. > > > > > > Grant Hudson > > > > > >> On 7 Jan 2014, at 19:21, Ron Sanders <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Everybody just a question about the arrangement of turn points. > > >> > > >> I noticed at Kingaroy and now at Waikerie that turn points are being > > >> described primarily by numbers these days. I was wondering if any > > >> body can tell me why?? > > >> Don't care one way or the other just interested to know if some body > > >> has made some kind of policy decision. > > >> > > >> Ron > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Aus-soaring mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> To check or change subscription details, visit: > > >> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > > > > > Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring > > > instrumentation since 1978 www.borgeltinstruments.com > > > tel: 07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784 > > > mob: 042835 5784 : int+61-42835 5784 > > > P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > > > > > Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring > > > instrumentation since 1978 www.borgeltinstruments.com > > > tel: 07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784 > > > mob: 042835 5784 : int+61-42835 5784 > > > P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > > > > > Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring > > > instrumentation since 1978 www.borgeltinstruments.com > > > tel: 07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784 > > > mob: 042835 5784 : int+61-42835 5784 > > > P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > [email protected] > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > [email protected] > To check or change subscription details, visit: > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring >
<<image002.gif>>
<<image004.gif>>
<<image005.gif>>
<<image003.gif>>
<<image006.gif>>
<<image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
