Mike, You are probable right on the mark here.
However, in this instance, I have no argument with their approach. The record shows that this device has saved lives (just as parachutes have saved lives). Do we begrudge Parachute ManufacturersÂ’ making an honest living from their enterprise? Limiting entry of competition, where possible, has always been a valid business principle. I am almost certain that the guys from (FLARM, Switzerland), monitor this forum. Perhaps they might like to make comment? Gary From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Borgelt Sent: Saturday, 14 March 2015 7:41 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] FLARM update At 05:54 PM 14/03/2015, you wrote: FYI: FLARM has now published it's latest update - v6. It's available here:Ă‚ http://flarm.com/support/firmware-updates/ The protocols in the current version (v5) and new version (v6) are supposedly totally incompatible, so please update your FLARMs before next flight or you won't be able to see pilots with the other version. <soapbox opinion> I think it's very irresponsible of FLARM to publish a backwards incompatible upgrade like this. I am glad I am not flying in the Alps this weekend. </opinion> I gather it is to prevent competitors from producing compatible hardware without paying royalties to Flarm. Mike
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
