*474.32 Abhorrent violent conduct* (1) For the purposes of this Subdivision, a person engages in abhorrent violent conduct if the person: (a) engages in a terrorist act ; or (b) murders another person; or (c) attempts to murder another person; or (d) tortures another person; or (e) rapes another person ; or (f) kidnaps another person . Kind regards
Paul Wilkins On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 12:31, Karl Auer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 11:55 +1000, Paul Wilkins wrote: > > There should be little cost to service providers in implementing take > > down notices. Video can now easily be fingerprinted, and repeat > > postings autoflagged for moderator take down. > > Video fingerprints can be avoided by transcoding video, or analog > copying it, or applying any of a thousand invisible (to humans) > filters, or in many cases just by snipping out a second here or there. > It takes almost no technical skill at all. No doubt automated > recognition of video content will get better, but it certainly is not > there yet. > > Reacting to a take-down notice is not something that can be automated > in any case. Is the notice genuine? Does it apply to the provider's > jurisdiction? Is it reasonable? Does it require a legal or a practical > response? These are not automatable decisions (at least, not yet). > > > The Assistance and Access Act was a big deal because it represents a > > credible threat to the democratic rights to freedom of speech and > > privacy. > > I'm glad we agree on that, at least. > > > The Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material Act on the other hand, is > > at worst a distraction, but rather looks like the government doing > > what they're supposed to do. > > Really? Ramming unworkable legislation through in the emotional heat > following a tragedy, without any public consultation, without any > discussion with affected parties, without consulting any technical > experts or seeking any input from civil society? > > > I can't see Voltaire going to the barricades to protect people's > > rights to propagate murder videos. > > Can't speak for Voltaire, but opposition to this legislation has > nothing to do with "murder videos". If you think it does, you are very > badly missing the point. > > Regards, K. > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Karl Auer ([email protected]) > http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer > http://twitter.com/kauer389 > > GPG fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D > Old fingerprint: A0CD 28F0 10BE FC21 C57C 67C1 19A6 83A4 9B0B 1D75 > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
