A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1038 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                kre
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:                   1038
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Error
Severity:                   Objection
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Robert Elz 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    2.5.3, 2.6 
Page Number:                2352 
Line Number:                74952 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2016-03-24 18:24 UTC
Last Modified:              2017-03-03 14:42 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Specification relies upon unspecified behaviour
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0001006 PS1 should be subject to command substi...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0003589) shware_systems (reporter) - 2017-03-03 14:42
 http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1038#c3589 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
As an fyi, in the 2017-03-02 phone call this was examined and the consensus
was XCU 2.3 was already explicit enough about how the Desired Action was
required to be handled, in that for this circumstance there is no character
following the '$' >in the current token< for the list in 2.6 to apply to,
so it gets treated as a literal $ would anyways. It was agreed as stated
this wasn't obvious enough, and pointed out additional potential
ambiguities, so clarifying text for these is being drafted. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2016-03-24 18:24 kre            New Issue                                    
2016-03-24 18:24 kre            Name                      => Robert Elz      
2016-03-24 18:24 kre            Section                   => 2.5.3, 2.6      
2016-03-24 18:24 kre            Page Number               => unknown         
2016-03-24 18:24 kre            Line Number               => unknown         
2016-08-11 15:29 Don Cragun     Relationship added       related to 0001006  
2017-03-02 16:22 nick           Page Number              unknown => 2352     
2017-03-02 16:22 nick           Line Number              unknown => 74952    
2017-03-02 16:22 nick           Interp Status             => ---             
2017-03-03 14:42 shware_systems Note Added: 0003589                          
======================================================================


Reply via email to