Can someone confirm that this is the correct full version of the specification to reference if I file a bug report?
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7582338/ On 06/13/17 18:05, Dimitri Staessens wrote: > > So apparently this change was somehow intended to allow the case. But > it is nevertheless wrong since it contradicts the following statement: > > "For functions in the "shall occur" list, a cancellation check must be > performed on every call regardless of whether, absent the > cancellation, the call would have blocked." > So even if there is a timeout, those functions have to check > cancellation and the behaviour is thus not undefined. The behaviour > may only be undefined if the cancellation point already performed the > check and is now suspended. > > I'd like to file a bug report and propose a change to the > specification to fix this. I'm new to this group and saw that the bug > reports reference page numbers. Can someone point me to where I can > find the official document so I can make the correct references? > > Thanks, > > Dimitri > > > On 06/13/17 15:13, Dimitri Staessens wrote: >> Hi Geoff, >> >> Awesome service, thanks! >> >> Dimitri >> >> On 06/13/17 13:35, Geoff Clare wrote: >>> Dimitri Staessens <dimitri.staess...@ugent.be> wrote, on 12 Jun 2017: >>>> Is there a way for me to track down the people that are responsible for >>>> this adjustment in the specification so that they can comment on their >>>> intentions and motivations for making it? >>> https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/14359/AI-136.txt >>> >
