2021-07-02 14:07:17 +0200, Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group:
> "Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Is:
> > 
> > printf '%s\n' a,b a,a | sort -c -t, -k1,1
> > 
> > Meant to succeed or not?
> > 
> > It fails in GNU, busybox, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Solaris, though with a
> > confusing:
> > 
> > sort: -:2: disorder: a,a
> 
> Try to use the POSIX sort variant to avoid the message.
[...]

I suppose you mean the -C option, which
still checks but doesn't output a diagnostics message.

btw, it seems to me -C should be referenced in the EXIT STATUS
section and in the -u description like for -c.

But the question here also stands for -C: should sort return
success or failure when a file is sorted according to the key
specification but not as per the last resort sort, and should -s
be added to the specification.

I'm personally happy with Geoff's answer on those.

-- 
Stephane

  • sort -c/C and last-... Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: sort -c/C ... Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: sort -... Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: so... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: so... Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • Re... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
            • ... Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
            • ... Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: sort -c/C ... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: sort -c/C ... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: sort -... Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: sort -... Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: so... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to