A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1471 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                joerg
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:                   1471
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Enhancement Request
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Jörg Schilling 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    make 
Page Number:                2888- 
Line Number:                97001- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2021-05-16 12:15 UTC
Last Modified:              2021-07-08 20:21 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Add an orthogonal interface for immediate macro
expansion definitions to make
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005398) steffen (reporter) - 2021-07-08 20:21
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1471#c5398 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
.. i had not seen hvd's posting at first.
But here, no, this is the very very current bmake that has been imported
into FreeBSD about two weeks ago or so.  I package it for a Linux
distribution.

t$ prt-get info bmake
Name:         bmake
Path:         /usr/ports/contrib
Version:      20210621
Release:      1
Description:  NetBSD make program
URL:          http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.html
Maintainer:   Steffen Nurpmeso, steffen at sdaoden dot eu

P.S.: the portable branch requires two tests to be disabled on Linux. 
Interesting problem, the standard is explicit and says signals which were
not ignored upon program start _only_.  Which i deem problematic for SIGINT
for example, given that bmake at least supports interrupt handlers etc. 
Let's see what the future brings.  The standard is like this, however. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2021-05-16 12:15 joerg          New Issue                                    
2021-05-16 12:15 joerg          Name                      => Jörg Schilling 
2021-05-16 12:15 joerg          Section                   => make            
2021-05-16 12:15 joerg          Page Number               => 2888-           
2021-05-16 12:15 joerg          Line Number               => 97001-          
2021-05-16 14:35 shware_systems Note Added: 0005356                          
2021-05-16 17:18 psmith         Note Added: 0005357                          
2021-05-16 19:02 shware_systems Note Added: 0005358                          
2021-05-16 19:12 kre            Note Added: 0005359                          
2021-05-16 19:49 shware_systems Note Added: 0005360                          
2021-05-16 21:26 joerg          Note Added: 0005361                          
2021-05-16 21:27 joerg          Note Edited: 0005361                         
2021-05-22 19:02 psmith         Note Added: 0005363                          
2021-07-08 16:43 geoffclare     Note Added: 0005393                          
2021-07-08 16:57 hvd            Note Added: 0005394                          
2021-07-08 19:30 steffen        Note Added: 0005395                          
2021-07-08 19:32 steffen        Note Added: 0005396                          
2021-07-08 20:01 kre            Note Added: 0005397                          
2021-07-08 20:21 steffen        Note Added: 0005398                          
======================================================================


  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to