5 Nisan 2023 Çarşamba tarihinde Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open
Group <austin-group-l@opengroup.org> yazdı:

> but should it
> be set fron the command substitution for the assignment to c?


I think it'd be practical, is there a reason why it shouldn't? And while
we're at it, is there a reason why assignments in a simple command
shouldn't be applied sequentially, from left to right? Most shells already
do it that way; that is,

    a=1 b=$a c=$b
    echo $a $b $c

prints `1 1 1' in them. Outliers are ash based shells; they apply
assignments concurrently but it isn't useful at all.



-- 
Oğuz
  • $? behaviour after c... Martijn Dekker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: $? behaviou... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: $? beha... Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: $? ... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: $? ... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • Re:... Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
            • ... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
              • ... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
                • ... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
              • ... Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
              • ... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: $? beha... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: $? ... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to