2023-11-20 17:30:32 +0000, Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group: [...] > On page 2920 line 97596 section find (-newer), change:<blockquote>The > primary shall evaluate as true if the modification time of the current file > is more recent than the modification time of the file named by the pathname > <i>file</i>.</blockquote>to:<blockquote>The primary shall evaluate as true > if the modification time of the current file is more recent than the > modification time of the file named by the pathname <i>file</i>. If > <i>file</i> names a symbolic link, the modification time used shall be that > of the file referenced by the symbolic link if either the <b>-H</b> or > <b>-L</b> is specified; if neither <b>-H</b> nor <b>-L</b> is specified, it > is unspecified whether the modification time is that of the symbolic link > itself or of the file referenced by the symbolic link. In either case, if > the referenced file does not exist, the modification time used shall be > that of the link itself. If <i>file</i> is a relative pathname, it shall be > resolved relative to the current working directory that was inherited by > <i>find</i> when it was invoked.</blockquote> [...]
Thanks, looks good. What about the example: > - fix the example at line 97747 to use -H, and maybe add a > "provided both file1 and file2 are accessible". ? -- Stephane
