A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1819 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                dannyniu
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:                   1819
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Omission
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       DannyNiu/NJF 
Organization:               <individual> 
User Reference:             202x_d4.1.pdf 
Section:                    date 
Page Number:                2770-2775 
Line Number:                Needs refactoring. 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2024-03-08 02:25 UTC
Last Modified:              2024-03-08 03:22 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Gut of the `date` spec is gone.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0006714) Don Cragun (manager) - 2024-03-08 03:22
 https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1819#c6714 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The format specifiers are fully specified in the description of the
<i>strftime</i> function as specifid in description of <i>date</i>'s
+<i>format</i> operand:
<blockquote>When the format is specified, the output shall be formatted as
if by <i>strftime</i>() with the specified format string...</blockquote>
The removal of those specifiers from the <i>date</i> utility's description
was intentional.  We don't want to try keeping the <i>date</i> utility's
description of those specifiers and the <i>strftime</i>() function's
description of those specifiers in sync.  We found in the past that keeping
two copies of those descriptions led to unintended discrepancies. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       New Issue                                    
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       Name                      => DannyNiu/NJF    
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       Organization              => <individual>    
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       User Reference            => 202x_d4.1.pdf   
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       Section                   => date            
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       Page Number               => 2770-2775       
2024-03-08 02:25 dannyniu       Line Number               => Needs refactoring.
2024-03-08 03:19 Guy Harris     Note Added: 0006713                          
2024-03-08 03:22 Don Cragun     Note Added: 0006714                          
======================================================================


  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to