Steffen Nurpmeso wrote, on 15 Apr 2025:
>
> Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote in
>  <Z_5vwwvojBKpOJl7@localhost>:
>  |Chet Ramey wrote, on 11 Apr 2025:
>  |> The question is whether shells will agree on *which* empty fields are
>  |> discarded. 
>  |[...]
>  |> For everyone who isn't on the bash mailing list, this is the message
>  |> from kre that Steffen is referring to that explains the bash and NetBSD
>  |> sh behavior.
>  |> 
>  |> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2025-03/msg00030.html
>  |
>  |Okay, with Chet's clue and kre's detailed description, I now see that
>  |my expectation of "empty fields may be discarded" leading to exactly
>  |two conforming behaviours was wrong.  I had naïvely assumed that each
>  |shell would either discard all empty fields or retain all empty fields.
> 
> Disclaimer: i will agree with your conclusion below.

Perhaps you changed your mind by the time you finished the email,
because I don't see an agreement with my conclusion.

> *But*.  No, his description is not right.

My take-away from his description was that shells can discard some
empty fields and retain others.  I didn't actually look too closely
at his explanation of the expansion(s).

Now that I've looked again, I can see that he made some major
mistakes.  For example:

kre> This output (from your message) shows what is happening

kre>  |   4,1=:a:/ a ,2=a/a,3=/,4=a

kre> Showing that $1 is ":a:/ a " $2 is "a" $3 is "" and $4 is 'a'

No, $1 is ":a:".  The part after the / is from the unquoted expansion
of $1 (with spaces produced by echo).

After that he says:

kre> There is a space at the end of $1, so ...

but there is no space at the end of $1, so any reasoning based on
that is bogus.

> then he says
> 
>   The ':' really has little to do with it, the space is a data
>   char, it isn't in IFS, so isn't going to be touched by field
>   splitting

Again, there is no space.

Given these mistakes, I think we need kre (and Chet because he
believed kre's description) to revisit their positions on this.

-- 
Geoff Clare <[email protected]>
The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England

  • Call for input on 2.... Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: Call for in... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: Call fo... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: Cal... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • Re:... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
            • ... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
              • ... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • Re:... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
            • ... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
              • ... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
                • ... Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
                • ... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to