Niu Danny wrote, on 21 Jun 2025: > > And when I inspected the schematics of the pax format archive example, > the diagram is in GIF format - it used an old compression algorithm, > when there's the PNG format which uses a new algorithm, which is > now supported by our very own `compress` utility!
I tried a conversion to PNG and the file reduced from 43K to 31K. Such a small difference hardly seems worth the bother. > But even better, can we support SVG format? The original (used to build the PDF) is EPS format, so I suppose there is potential for converting that to SVG for the HTML version. > It's 2025, browsers and the computer systems that run them are > much more capable now. Can we consider updating our build targets? Something to consider when we update the HTML version for TC1 perhaps. -- Geoff Clare <g.cl...@opengroup.org> The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England
