Thanks. Sarah, can you propose appropriate changes?
Eliot
ps: Tony, I appreciate your position. Let's have a drink at an
appropriate time about this one.
On 22.01.2025 22:39, Tony Li wrote:
On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:24 AM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot
Lear) - rfc-ise at rfc-editor.org <mailforwa...@cloudmails.net> wrote:
I have one more suggestion for Section 2.3, to address inclusive wording:
s/traditional/typical or typical terrestrial/
Tony would one of those work for you?
I have no problems with real inclusivity issues.
However, this is not one of them. Tradition is not an evil word.
Changing every instance is simply overkill and unnecessary. Let’s not
cancel all of our vocabulary.
That said, I’m fine with ’typical’, ’typical terrestrial’ or even
‘legacy’.
Tony
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
