Hi Karen, I went through and checked all 19 instances (7 I asked for, plus 12 you found). They all look good. Thank you for taking the initiative and fixing them all to make the document consistent!
LL > On Apr 18, 2025, at 4:56 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Hello Laurence, > > We believe the request is to make “Section X of [RFCXXX]” all one clickable > link; however, that format is not currently used in the RFC series. Note that > there are 19 instances of “Section X of [RFCXXX]”, so only updating the 7 > instances that were outlined in GitHub would introduce inconsistency within > the document (as well as within the RFC series). > > Note that we did find one reference that was not clickable; we updated the > format as follows: > > OLD: > When COSE protection is used, the profile should specify whether COSE tags > are used or not. > Note that RFC 8392 requires COSE tags be used in a CWT tag. > > NEW: > When COSE protection is used, the profile should specify whether COSE tags > are used or not. > Note that [RFC8392] requires COSE tags be used in a CWT tag. > > —Files (please refresh)— > > The updated XML file is here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.xml > > The updated output files are here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.html > > These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > These diff files show only the change made during the last editing round: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastdiff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) > > These diff files show all changes made to date: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Best regards, > RFC Editor/kc > >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Laurence Lundblade <l...@securitytheory.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi RFC Editor, >> >> As part of the review Roman conducted on the Location NULL/NaN issue a >> suggestion was made to improve the references to sections of referenced >> RFCs. The EAT authors would like to request the following changes. The >> change is only to make the “Section X” a clickable link. >> >> Old: >> Section X of {{RFCYYYY}} >> >> New: >> {{Section X of RFCYYYY}} >> >> There are 7 occurrences of this. >> >> You can see the change in the EAT GitHub repo here: >> https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/commit/462fbba8cf1449bbd648f3ec3f4f10af02b07ae4 >> >> Thank you! >> >> LL > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
