Hi Karen! I confirmed with the WG. I approved these changes.
Roman -----Original Message----- From: Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 1:19 PM To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; lgl securitytheory.com <l...@securitytheory.com>; Giridhar Mandyam <giridhar.mand...@gmail.com>; Jeremy O'Donoghue <jodon...@qti.qualcomm.com>; Carl Wallace <c...@redhoundsoftware.com> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>; rats-...@ietf.org; rats-chairs <rats-cha...@ietf.org>; Smith, Ned <ned.sm...@intel.com>; auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> Subject: AD [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 <draft-ietf-rats-eat-31> for your review Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Laurence and *Roman (AD), Thank you for your reply. *Roman, please let us know the status of this document. Note that we await your approval of the following, which can be viewed at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html: Sections 3, 4.1, 4.2.3.2, 4.2.3.3, 4.2.10, 4.2.18, 5, 6.3.6, 7.3, 7.3.1, 7.3.2, and 9.1 Appendices A.1.7, A.2.2, A.2.3, B.2, and D —Files (please refresh)— The updated XML file is here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.xml The updated output files are here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.html These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) These diff files show only the change made during the last editing round: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) These diff files show all changes made to date: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-rfcdiff.html (side by side) Thank you, RFC Editor/kc > On Apr 21, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Laurence Lundblade via auth48archive > <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Hi Karen, > > I went through and checked all 19 instances (7 I asked for, plus 12 you > found). They all look good. Thank you for taking the initiative and fixing > them all to make the document consistent! > > LL > > >> On Apr 18, 2025, at 4:56 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Hello Laurence, >> >> We believe the request is to make “Section X of [RFCXXX]” all one clickable >> link; however, that format is not currently used in the RFC series. Note >> that there are 19 instances of “Section X of [RFCXXX]”, so only updating the >> 7 instances that were outlined in GitHub would introduce inconsistency >> within the document (as well as within the RFC series). >> >> Note that we did find one reference that was not clickable; we updated the >> format as follows: >> >> OLD: >> When COSE protection is used, the profile should specify whether COSE tags >> are used or not. >> Note that RFC 8392 requires COSE tags be used in a CWT tag. >> >> NEW: >> When COSE protection is used, the profile should specify whether COSE tags >> are used or not. >> Note that [RFC8392] requires COSE tags be used in a CWT tag. >> >> —Files (please refresh)— >> >> The updated XML file is here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.xml >> >> The updated output files are here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.html >> >> These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48rfcdiff.html (side >> by side) >> >> These diff files show only the change made during the last editing round: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastdiff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastrfcdiff.html (side by >> side) >> >> These diff files show all changes made to date: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-rfcdiff.html (side by >> side) >> >> Best regards, >> RFC Editor/kc >> >>> On Apr 18, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Laurence Lundblade <l...@securitytheory.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi RFC Editor, >>> >>> As part of the review Roman conducted on the Location NULL/NaN issue a >>> suggestion was made to improve the references to sections of referenced >>> RFCs. The EAT authors would like to request the following changes. The >>> change is only to make the “Section X” a clickable link. >>> >>> Old: >>> Section X of {{RFCYYYY}} >>> >>> New: >>> {{Section X of RFCYYYY}} >>> >>> There are 7 occurrences of this. >>> >>> You can see the change in the EAT GitHub repo here: >>> https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/commit/462fbba8cf1449bbd648f3ec3 >>> f4f10af02b07ae4 >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> LL >> > > -- > auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To > unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
