Hi Ted, Stuart, and Chris, Thank you for your replies. We have updated accordingly.
Ted - Thank you for helping me understand the phrasing with "traditional DNS Update protocol". I spent some time looking through the other instances in the document, and your explanation really helped me understand. Stuart and Ted - There are no further questions from me! Please send along your formal approvals as you can. Chris - I appreciate the extra check on that small typo. Always reassuring to know there are extra eyes on the look out. The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.xml The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes only) Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the most recent version. For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9665 Thank you, RFC Editor/st > On May 30, 2025, at 11:48 AM, Chris Box <chris.box.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Stuart and Ted for the clearly detailed review, which must have > taken hours. > > I read through your updates and noted a typo in one of the changes, namely > the duplication of the word "of". > > NEW: > New entries may be added either as a result of > Standards Action (Section 4.9 of the IANA Guidelines) or with > IESG Approval (Section 4.10 of of the IANA Guidelines) [RFC8126], > provided that ... > > However this hasn't appeared in > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.html so I think we're fine. > > Chris -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
