Hi Alanna-- On Mon 2025-06-02 14:14:31 -0700, Alanna Paloma wrote: > ) “IMAP” and “SMTP” are considered well-known abbreviations and > therefore do not require expansions. > > See here for more information on abbreviations: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list
OK, that seems fine to me :) > To match the companion document RFC-to-be 9788, we have updated to > “Non-Structural Header Field”. > > Additionally, we have added a definition for “Non-Structural Header > Field” in the Terminology section, per Bernie’s request in the AUTH48 > thread of RFC-to-be 9788 (see > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/mHJq9YpnEB-vSl2pIeLZSWFzpIE/>). > Please > review and confirm that the text is satisfactory. Thanks, this is a nice and tidy cleanup. I approve. --dkg
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
