Ketan, 

Thank you for your reply. It has been recorded on the status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9816

RFC Editor/ar

> On Jul 10, 2025, at 5:27 AM, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alice,
> 
> I've reviewed and I approve of this change.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan
> 
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:49 AM Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> Acee, Ketan (as AD), 
> 
> *AD - Please review this change and let us know if you approve (changed from 
> "MUST" to "must" per Acee's reply to #5).
> 
> Original:                                                                     
>          
>    The Link Local/Remote Identifiers of the peering interfaces MUST be        
>          
>    used in the link NLRI as described in section 5.2.2 of                     
>          
>    [I-D.ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf].      
> 
> Current:
>    The Link Local/Remote Identifiers of the peering interfaces must be        
>          
>    used in the link NLRI as described in Section 5.2.2 of [RFC9815].
> 
> 
> Acee,
> Thank you for your reply. My apologies for the delay. Please see the 
> follow-ups below. The revised files are here (please refresh):
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816.txt
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816.pdf
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816.xml
> 
> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816-diff.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> 
> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816-auth48diff.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9816-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> 
> 
> Re: #4, we updated to the text you provided except for expanding "SPF", as it 
> has already been expanded within the document and is used earlier within the 
> same sentence without expansion. If you prefer otherwise, please let us know.
> 
> FYI, in Section 2, this has been updated as follows; please let us know if 
> you prefer otherwise.
> Old:   BGP-SPF [RFC9815]
> New:   BGP-LS SPF [RFC9815]
> 
> 
> We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors
> before continuing the publication process. This page shows 
> the AUTH48 status of your document:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9816
> 
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ar

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to