On Aug 16, 2025 at 4:27:30 AM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> Tim, did you get a chance to double check the ABNF with James Manger? Note > that there were no issues with the ABNF checks on our end. > Yes, and he reported the ABNF correct. -Tim > > —Files (please refresh)— > > Updated XML file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.xml > > Updated output files: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.html > > Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > Diff files showing all changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9839 > > Best regards, > > Karen Moore > RFC Production Center > > On Aug 15, 2025, at 5:49 PM, Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com> wrote: > > What Paul said. -Tim > > On Aug 15, 2025 at 9:48:57 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> > wrote: > > On Aug 15, 2025, at 17:46, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Paul and Tim, > > We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9839__;!!PtGJab4!7oxwV35xvNK7a5-YAwJ18sDgzernD7RGTdQBjWUZ3ZWW7y6rcYNL97wKIHgwwLghZqItgwMPZedHaSHC96i03-gMA6zozVI0uA$ > [rfc-editor[.]org]>. Please confirm if you would like to update the text > per Rob’s suggestion below. Otherwise, we will move forward with > publication. > > Current (Section 3): > [RFC9413], "Maintaining Robust Protocols", provides a thorough > discussion of strategies for dealing with issues in input data. > > Perhaps: > "Maintaining Robust Protocols” [RFC9413] provides a thorough > discussion of strategies for dealing with issues in input data. > > > Either is fine. Please base your decision on the RFC Style Guide. If the > guide doesn't have such advice, feel free to pick one method and add it to > the style guide. > > --Paul Hoffman > > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
