Hi Tim, Great! We will proceed with the publication process.
Thanks to all for your time! Best regards, Karen Moore RFC Production Center > On Aug 16, 2025, at 4:44 AM, Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com> wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2025 at 4:27:30 AM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > >> >> Tim, did you get a chance to double check the ABNF with James Manger? Note >> that there were no issues with the ABNF checks on our end. > > Yes, and he reported the ABNF correct. > > -Tim > >> >> >> —Files (please refresh)— >> >> Updated XML file: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.xml >> >> Updated output files: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839.html >> >> Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> Diff files showing all changes: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9839-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9839 >> >> Best regards, >> >> Karen Moore >> RFC Production Center >> >>> On Aug 15, 2025, at 5:49 PM, Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com> wrote: >>> >>> What Paul said. -Tim >>> >>> On Aug 15, 2025 at 9:48:57 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: >>>> On Aug 15, 2025, at 17:46, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Paul and Tim, >>>>> >>>>> We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page >>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9839__;!!PtGJab4!7oxwV35xvNK7a5-YAwJ18sDgzernD7RGTdQBjWUZ3ZWW7y6rcYNL97wKIHgwwLghZqItgwMPZedHaSHC96i03-gMA6zozVI0uA$ >>>>> [rfc-editor[.]org]>. Please confirm if you would like to update the >>>>> text per Rob’s suggestion below. Otherwise, we will move forward with >>>>> publication. >>>>> >>>>> Current (Section 3): >>>>> [RFC9413], "Maintaining Robust Protocols", provides a thorough >>>>> discussion of strategies for dealing with issues in input data. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps: >>>>> "Maintaining Robust Protocols” [RFC9413] provides a thorough >>>>> discussion of strategies for dealing with issues in input data. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Either is fine. Please base your decision on the RFC Style Guide. If the >>>> guide doesn't have such advice, feel free to pick one method and add it to >>>> the style guide. >>>> >>>> --Paul Hoffman >>>> >>>> >> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
