Hi Authors, All author approvals have been received: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9788
We will now ask IANA to update their registry accordingly to match this document. After the IANA updates are complete, we will move forward with the publication process. Thank you, Alanna Paloma RFC Production Center > On Aug 16, 2025, at 3:50 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen <ber...@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> > wrote: > > Hi Alanna > > I herewith sign out of RFC-to-be 9788. > > cheers > Bernie > > -- > > http://ucom.ch/ > Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology > > > On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Alanna Paloma wrote: > >> Hi Authors, >> >> Thank you for the updated XML file. We have updated the other document files >> accordingly; see below. >> >> Once we have received Bernie's approval, we will ask IANA to update their >> registry accordingly. After the IANA updates are complete, we will move this >> document forward in the publication process. >> >> Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9788 >> >> — FILES (please refresh) — >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788.pdf >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-diff.html (comprehensive diff) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >> changes side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-lastdiff.html (last version to >> this one) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9788-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between >> last version and this) >> >> Best regards, >> Alanna Paloma >> RFC Production Center >> >> >>> On Aug 14, 2025, at 8:44 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi RFC Editor, all-- >>> >>> As Bernie noted, the authors have agreed on some additional terminology >>> cleanup for draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection, aka RFC-to-be-9788. >>> >>> We're trying to be clearer about message "composition" and "rendering", >>> as opposed to "sending" and "receiving", since the work takes place in >>> the end user's MUA regardless of the moment of submission to or >>> retrieval from the SMTP ecosystem. >>> >>> The authors have agreed that on this as an editorial improvement for >>> terminology in the draft, but it offers no substantive or functional >>> changes to the guidance. >>> >>> Note that we've also incorporated a trivial editorial cleanup offered by >>> Rob Sayre in this revision. >>> >>> Please see the attached updated XML. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> --dkg >>> >>> <rfc9788.xml> >> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
