I think it would be useful for each of the bullets in this page were updated with the new registry titles.
https://www.iana.org/numbers =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 16:54 Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sandy, all, > > We’ve completed the renaming of the IP address registries and added links > to the telechat minutes where applicable (for those cited in RFCs). > > Thanks again for your patience. > > Best regards, > Sabrina > > On Fri Sep 26 16:30:12 2025, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Sabrina, > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > Sandy > > > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2025, at 9:22 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana- > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sandy, > > > > > > We’re just waiting for the telechat minutes to be posted so that we > > > can link to them from the registries. > > > > > > We’ll make the updates as soon as the link is available and will let > > > you know once that’s done. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Sabrina > > > > > > On Fri Sep 26 14:47:40 2025, [email protected] wrote: > > >> Hi IANA, > > >> > > >> We updated the registry names in the document but we don’t see that > > >> the registries have been updated. Do you have an idea of when that > > >> will happen? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Sandy Ginoza > > >> RFC Production Center > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Sep 18, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Excellent. Hopefully we can exit the "48" hours shortly... > > >>> > > >>> Regards/Ngā mihi > > >>> Brian Carpenter > > >>> > > >>> On 19-Sep-25 04:20, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote: > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> The IESG approved the renaming of the IP address registries today. > > >>>> Based on their feedback, the word “Space” has been retained/added > > >>>> in > > >>>> the names. Please see the updated list below. > > >>>> As a reminder, each registry will include a “Formerly known as” > > >>>> note > > >>>> at the top, along with a footnote linking to the relevant telechat > > >>>> minutes. We do not plan to change any URLs at this time; if we > > >>>> ever > > >>>> do, the old links will be redirected. > > >>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> Sabrina > > >>>> ==== > > >>>> Current: IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry > > >>>> New: IPv4 Address Space > > >>>> Current: IPv4 Multicast Address Space Registry > > >>>> New: IPv4 Multicast Address Space > > >>>> Current: IANA IPv4 Special-Purpose Address Registry > > >>>> New: IPv4 Special-Purpose Address Space > > >>>> Current: IPv4 Recovered Address Space > > >>>> New: No change > > >>>> Current: Bootstrap Service Registry for IPv4 Address Space > > >>>> New: No change > > >>>> Current: Internet Protocol Version 6 Address Space > > >>>> New: IPv6 Address Space > > >>>> Current: IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments > > >>>> New: IPv6 Global Unicast Address Space > > >>>> Current: IPv6 Multicast Address Space Registry > > >>>> New: IPv6 Multicast Address Space > > >>>> Current: IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry > > >>>> New: IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Space > > >>>> Current: Bootstrap Service Registry for IPv6 Address Space > > >>>> New: No change > > >>>> Current: Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Anycast Addresses > > >>>> New: IPv6 Anycast Address Space > > >>>> === > > >>>> On Thu Sep 04 18:43:43 2025, [email protected] wrote: > > >>>>> Sandy, > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 11:35 AM, Sandy Ginoza <[email protected] > > >>>>>> editor.org> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi Bob, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 11:20 AM, Bob Hinden <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sabrina, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thanks. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Maybe I am confused, the actual registry referenced in the > > >>>>>>> document > > >>>>>>> is: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> [IANA1] IANA, "IPv6 Addresses", > > >>>>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address- > > >>>>>>> space> . > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The title of that registry is: "Internet Protocol Version 6 > > >>>>>>> Address > > >>>>>>> Space” > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Or did it just change? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The document calls it “IPv6 Addresses”. That should probable > > >>>>>>> match > > >>>>>>> the actual name of the registry. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Agree - the goal is for the document to match whatever naming > > >>>>>> convention IANA adopts. I updated the names throughout the > > >>>>>> document > > >>>>>> based on the names IANA proposed. I’ll update the document > > >>>>>> again > > >>>>>> once the registry titles are final. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cool, thanks > > >>>>> Bob > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>> Sandy Ginoza > > >>>>>> RFC Production Center > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Bob > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 10:54 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana- > > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Bob, David, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Bob, the concerns were only about the suggested names, not the > > >>>>>>>> document itself. They proposed changing “Addresses” to > > >>>>>>>> “Address > > >>>>>>>> Space,” which I’ll take back to the team for a quick check. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> We will keep you posted if the names change, but we hope to > > >>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>> this wrapped up by the next telechat. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any other questions. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>> Sabrina > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu Sep 04 15:35:11 2025, [email protected] wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Could it be as simple as singular vs plural? When I first > > >>>>>>>>> read > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> list of > > >>>>>>>>> names, the plural "Addresses" really didn't sound right to > > >>>>>>>>> me. > > >>>>>>>>> But > > >>>>>>>>> when I > > >>>>>>>>> thought about it, as they are lists, the plural seems to be > > >>>>>>>>> correct, > > >>>>>>>>> but it > > >>>>>>>>> just doesn't sound right when I read it aloud. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 10:16 AM Bob Hinden > > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Sabrina, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Could you be more specific about what the IESG concerns > > >>>>>>>>>> were? > > >>>>>>>>>> For > > >>>>>>>>>> example, are you referring to the IANA considerations in the > > >>>>>>>>>> document, or > > >>>>>>>>>> something else? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Bob > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 8:06 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana- > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The IESG discussed this in their formal telechat today, but > > >>>>>>>>>>> requested > > >>>>>>>>>> more time to consider the changes. They raised concerns with > > >>>>>>>>>> some > > >>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>> suggestions that use “Addresses” and asked us to propose > > >>>>>>>>>> alternatives. They > > >>>>>>>>>> plan to confirm at the next formal telechat, scheduled for > > >>>>>>>>>> 9/18. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> We’ll keep you posted and let you know once these are > > >>>>>>>>>>> approved. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your patience. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sabrina > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu Aug 21 21:08:22 2025, sabrina.tanamal wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on this: we've received review and approval > > >>>>>>>>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andy > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Newton and Éric Vynke. We'll be asking the IESG to approve > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>>>>> during the next telechat on September 4th. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the URLs, these will remain unchanged for now. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> When > > >>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>> do > > >>>>>>>>>>>> update them, we'll put redirects in place. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> We also plan to retain the old name in a "Formerly known > > >>>>>>>>>>>> as" > > >>>>>>>>>>>> field > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the top of the registry. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sabrina > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu Aug 21 15:09:43 2025, [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bob and Brian, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your reviews - we won’t publish until we can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> titles in the IANA registries. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 20, 2025, at 10:17 PM, Bob Hinden > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine for me too. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 20, 2025, at 6:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems 100% OK to me, assuming IANA proceeds as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards/Ngā mihi > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21-Aug-25 08:52, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brian, Bob, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We updated the following registry names throughout: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Protocol Version 6 Address Space -> IPv6 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Addresses > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments -> IPv6 Global > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unicast > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Addresses > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry -> IPv6 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Special- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purpose > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Addresses > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can view the most recent updates in the following > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diffs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lastdiff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lastrfcdiff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by side) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current files are available here: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.txt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.pdf > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48 diffs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48diff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comprehensive diffs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812-diff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rfcdiff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> side) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds like the title changes will be documented as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IESG > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> management item, so there is no need to note the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please confirm the updates and that the document is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication. Note that we may ask for another review > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INT > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ART ADs suggest other updates. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2025, at 4:30 PM, Brian E Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the editor of RFC-to-be 9812 <draft-ietf-6man- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addr- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 05> , > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think these changes look good and I assume the RFC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply them to the text. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also assume that IANA will install redirects for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sake > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users who look for the old names. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards/Ngā mihi > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Aug-25 10:30, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay. We needed to escalate this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> internally, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but we've now reached a decision. We’ve proposed the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes (see attached) and have requested that the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INT > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ART > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ADs sign off, as a few registries were named in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFCs. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once they've signed off, we'll submit a management > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> item > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IESG > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval (if they think this is needed). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your patience. We will keep you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> informed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes are online. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sabrina > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon Aug 18 19:17:54 2025, [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything new on this? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2025, at 2:14 PM, Sandy Ginoza > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi IANA, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just checking the status of the updates to the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2025, at 1:54 PM, Brian E Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been several weeks, is it time to officially > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nag > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards/Ngā mihi > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19-Jul-25 22:17, Bob Hinden wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, thanks. Please let us know if there is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2025, at 12:15 PM, Sandy Ginoza > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bob, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s waiting for the IANA registry titles to be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not marked Brian’s approval as I’m hoping at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors will review the document once updated. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We’ve been coordinating with IANA behind the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding is that the changes are being > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2025, at 1:36 AM, Bob Hinden > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Working on my 6man status slides. I noticed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9812 it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian’s approval. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that correct? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2025, at 11:06 PM, Brian E > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's fine Sandy, thanks. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01-Jul-25 09:04, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brian, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2025, at 1:30 PM, Brian E > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Sandy. You still have me listed as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be clear, I have approved everything > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pending > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes to the registry titles - I guess > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you'd > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final check when that is done? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for not being clear — I didn’t see an > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explicit > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from you, so I thought you might want to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry titles have been updated. I’m > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopeful > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimum, don’t mind being on the hook to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updates are correct and there are no > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerns > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> naming > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conventions. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any concerns > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01-Jul-25 04:00, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi David and Brian, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your replies. David, we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval on the AUTH48 page > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9812>. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will notify you when the updates to the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> titles are complete. Our understanding is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently under discussion. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 2025, at 9:05 PM, David Farmer > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did receive the original email. I have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes, and they look good to me. It can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the IANA registry titles are updated. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 3:13 PM Sandy > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ginoza > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Suresh, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your review and for letting > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not receive the original AUTH48 mail. We > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval on the AUTH48 page > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9812> and will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication once approvals and updates to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> titles are complete. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2025, at 12:59 PM, Suresh > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Krishnan > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sandy, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work on this. I also > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian, have not received the original > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail. I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest version and it looks good. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consider > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:00 PM Sandy > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ginoza > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brian, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your review. We have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> described below and posted the updated > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.txt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.pdf > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48 diffs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48diff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comprehensive diffs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rfcdiff.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few notes: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - We are unsure why the initial AUTH48 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received. Thank you for letting us > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know; > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> track > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether there are ongoing issues. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Regarding your name, if you prefer "B. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter”, we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are happy to update this document and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moving > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward. Please let us know your > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Regarding "I assume the IANA and RFC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actions > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be done just before the actual > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication.” > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already updated the registration > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> procedure. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with IANA in the background to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinate > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updates > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the registry titles. I expect you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delay > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication of this RFC until the titles > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so the document can be updated > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordingly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let me > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know if this assumption is incorrect. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 26, 2025, at 2:02 PM, Brian E > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have read the various versions and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diffs, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and for me this is all good. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I assume the IANA and RFC Editor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actions > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just before the actual publication.) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other answers in line below. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks much > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27-Jun-25 06:21, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings authors, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that we await your review > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9812. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know how you would like > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> items below. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2025, at 4:38 PM, rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor@rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Authors, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve (as necessary) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following questions, which are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XML > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) <!--[rfced] This document has been > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new BCP > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number. However, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is unclear whether this document > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grouped > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an existing BCP. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the list of BCPs > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if the newly > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned BCP number is correct or if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to an existing BCP. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See the complete list of BCPs here: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcps > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a slight relationship with BCP > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 153 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new BCP number > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appropriate. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Brian, we have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> header as shown below > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to match what appears in the header > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFCs > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you've > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authored. Please > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let us know if you prefer otherwise. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original: B. E. Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current: B. Carpenter > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's fine. A bit too late to change > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keywords > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (beyond > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that appear in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the title) for use on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/search. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Regarding the RFC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
