Hi David, Thank you for pointing these out. The updates have been completed:
https://www.iana.org/numbers https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address-space https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments Best regards, Sabrina On Fri Oct 10 10:46:50 2025, [email protected] wrote: > Also, several of the notes in “IPv6 Address space” and “IPv6 Global Unicast > Address Space” refer to the old title of the “IPv6 Special-Purpose Address > Space.” > > Similarly, several of the footnotes in “IPv4 Address Space” refer to the > old title of the “IPv4 Address Space.” > > Thanks > > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > =============================================== > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 05:25 David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think it would be useful for each of the bullets in this page were > > updated with the new registry titles. > > > > https://www.iana.org/numbers > > > > > > =============================================== > > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > > Networking & Telecommunication Services > > Office of Information Technology > > University of Minnesota > > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > > =============================================== > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 16:54 Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Sandy, all, > >> > >> We’ve completed the renaming of the IP address registries and added links > >> to the telechat minutes where applicable (for those cited in RFCs). > >> > >> Thanks again for your patience. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Sabrina > >> > >> On Fri Sep 26 16:30:12 2025, [email protected] wrote: > >> > Hi Sabrina, > >> > > >> > Thanks for the update! > >> > > >> > Sandy > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sep 26, 2025, at 9:22 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana- > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi Sandy, > >> > > > >> > > We’re just waiting for the telechat minutes to be posted so that we > >> > > can link to them from the registries. > >> > > > >> > > We’ll make the updates as soon as the link is available and will let > >> > > you know once that’s done. > >> > > > >> > > Thank you, > >> > > Sabrina > >> > > > >> > > On Fri Sep 26 14:47:40 2025, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> Hi IANA, > >> > >> > >> > >> We updated the registry names in the document but we don’t see that > >> > >> the registries have been updated. Do you have an idea of when that > >> > >> will happen? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Sandy Ginoza > >> > >> RFC Production Center > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 18, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter > >> > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Excellent. Hopefully we can exit the "48" hours shortly... > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Regards/Ngā mihi > >> > >>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On 19-Sep-25 04:20, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote: > >> > >>>> Hi all, > >> > >>>> The IESG approved the renaming of the IP address registries today. > >> > >>>> Based on their feedback, the word “Space” has been retained/added > >> > >>>> in > >> > >>>> the names. Please see the updated list below. > >> > >>>> As a reminder, each registry will include a “Formerly known as” > >> > >>>> note > >> > >>>> at the top, along with a footnote linking to the relevant telechat > >> > >>>> minutes. We do not plan to change any URLs at this time; if we > >> > >>>> ever > >> > >>>> do, the old links will be redirected. > >> > >>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. > >> > >>>> Best regards, > >> > >>>> Sabrina > >> > >>>> ==== > >> > >>>> Current: IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry > >> > >>>> New: IPv4 Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: IPv4 Multicast Address Space Registry > >> > >>>> New: IPv4 Multicast Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: IANA IPv4 Special-Purpose Address Registry > >> > >>>> New: IPv4 Special-Purpose Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: IPv4 Recovered Address Space > >> > >>>> New: No change > >> > >>>> Current: Bootstrap Service Registry for IPv4 Address Space > >> > >>>> New: No change > >> > >>>> Current: Internet Protocol Version 6 Address Space > >> > >>>> New: IPv6 Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments > >> > >>>> New: IPv6 Global Unicast Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: IPv6 Multicast Address Space Registry > >> > >>>> New: IPv6 Multicast Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry > >> > >>>> New: IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Space > >> > >>>> Current: Bootstrap Service Registry for IPv6 Address Space > >> > >>>> New: No change > >> > >>>> Current: Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Anycast Addresses > >> > >>>> New: IPv6 Anycast Address Space > >> > >>>> === > >> > >>>> On Thu Sep 04 18:43:43 2025, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >>>>> Sandy, > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 11:35 AM, Sandy Ginoza <[email protected] > >> > >>>>>> editor.org> wrote: > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Hi Bob, > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 11:20 AM, Bob Hinden <[email protected]> > >> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> Sabrina, > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> Thanks. > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> Maybe I am confused, the actual registry referenced in the > >> > >>>>>>> document > >> > >>>>>>> is: > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> [IANA1] IANA, "IPv6 Addresses", > >> > >>>>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address- > >> > >>>>>>> space> . > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> The title of that registry is: "Internet Protocol Version 6 > >> > >>>>>>> Address > >> > >>>>>>> Space” > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> Or did it just change? > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> The document calls it “IPv6 Addresses”. That should probable > >> > >>>>>>> match > >> > >>>>>>> the actual name of the registry. > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Agree - the goal is for the document to match whatever naming > >> > >>>>>> convention IANA adopts. I updated the names throughout the > >> > >>>>>> document > >> > >>>>>> based on the names IANA proposed. I’ll update the document > >> > >>>>>> again > >> > >>>>>> once the registry titles are final. > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> Cool, thanks > >> > >>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>> Sandy Ginoza > >> > >>>>>> RFC Production Center > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 10:54 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana- > >> > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Hi Bob, David, > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Bob, the concerns were only about the suggested names, not the > >> > >>>>>>>> document itself. They proposed changing “Addresses” to > >> > >>>>>>>> “Address > >> > >>>>>>>> Space,” which I’ll take back to the team for a quick check. > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> We will keep you posted if the names change, but we hope to > >> > >>>>>>>> have > >> > >>>>>>>> this wrapped up by the next telechat. > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any other questions. > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>> Sabrina > >> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>> On Thu Sep 04 15:35:11 2025, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>> Could it be as simple as singular vs plural? When I first > >> > >>>>>>>>> read > >> > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>> list of > >> > >>>>>>>>> names, the plural "Addresses" really didn't sound right to > >> > >>>>>>>>> me. > >> > >>>>>>>>> But > >> > >>>>>>>>> when I > >> > >>>>>>>>> thought about it, as they are lists, the plural seems to be > >> > >>>>>>>>> correct, > >> > >>>>>>>>> but it > >> > >>>>>>>>> just doesn't sound right when I read it aloud. > >> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks. > >> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 10:16 AM Bob Hinden > >> > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Sabrina, > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Could you be more specific about what the IESG concerns > >> > >>>>>>>>>> were? > >> > >>>>>>>>>> For > >> > >>>>>>>>>> example, are you referring to the IANA considerations in the > >> > >>>>>>>>>> document, or > >> > >>>>>>>>>> something else? > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 8:06 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> The IESG discussed this in their formal telechat today, but > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> requested > >> > >>>>>>>>>> more time to consider the changes. They raised concerns with > >> > >>>>>>>>>> some > >> > >>>>>>>>>> of > >> > >>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>> suggestions that use “Addresses” and asked us to propose > >> > >>>>>>>>>> alternatives. They > >> > >>>>>>>>>> plan to confirm at the next formal telechat, scheduled for > >> > >>>>>>>>>> 9/18. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> We’ll keep you posted and let you know once these are > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> approved. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your patience. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sabrina > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu Aug 21 21:08:22 2025, sabrina.tanamal wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on this: we've received review and approval > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> from > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andy > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Newton and Éric Vynke. We'll be asking the IESG to approve > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> during the next telechat on September 4th. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the URLs, these will remain unchanged for now. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> When > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> we > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> do > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> update them, we'll put redirects in place. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We also plan to retain the old name in a "Formerly known > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> as" > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> field > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> at > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the top of the registry. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sabrina > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu Aug 21 15:09:43 2025, [email protected] > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bob and Brian, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your reviews - we won’t publish until we can > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> titles in the IANA registries. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 20, 2025, at 10:17 PM, Bob Hinden > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine for me too. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 20, 2025, at 6:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems 100% OK to me, assuming IANA proceeds as > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards/Ngā mihi > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21-Aug-25 08:52, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brian, Bob, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We updated the following registry names throughout: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Protocol Version 6 Address Space -> IPv6 > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Addresses > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments -> IPv6 Global > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unicast > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Addresses > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry -> IPv6 > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Special- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purpose > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Addresses > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can view the most recent updates in the following > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diffs: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lastdiff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lastrfcdiff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by side) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current files are available here: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.xml > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.txt > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.pdf > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48 diffs: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48diff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comprehensive diffs: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812-diff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rfcdiff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> side) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds like the title changes will be documented as > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IESG > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> management item, so there is no need to note the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please confirm the updates and that the document is > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication. Note that we may ask for another review > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INT > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ART ADs suggest other updates. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2025, at 4:30 PM, Brian E Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the editor of RFC-to-be 9812 <draft-ietf-6man- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addr- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 05> , > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think these changes look good and I assume the RFC > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply them to the text. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also assume that IANA will install redirects for > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sake > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users who look for the old names. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards/Ngā mihi > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20-Aug-25 10:30, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay. We needed to escalate this > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> internally, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but we've now reached a decision. We’ve proposed the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes (see attached) and have requested that the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INT > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ART > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ADs sign off, as a few registries were named in > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFCs. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once they've signed off, we'll submit a management > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> item > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IESG > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval (if they think this is needed). > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your patience. We will keep you > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> informed > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes are online. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sabrina > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon Aug 18 19:17:54 2025, [email protected] > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything new on this? > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2025, at 2:14 PM, Sandy Ginoza > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi IANA, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just checking the status of the updates to the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2025, at 1:54 PM, Brian E Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been several weeks, is it time to officially > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nag > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA? > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards/Ngā mihi > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19-Jul-25 22:17, Bob Hinden wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, thanks. Please let us know if there is > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2025, at 12:15 PM, Sandy Ginoza > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bob, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s waiting for the IANA registry titles to be > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not marked Brian’s approval as I’m hoping at > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors will review the document once updated. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We’ve been coordinating with IANA behind the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenes. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding is that the changes are being > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandy > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2025, at 1:36 AM, Bob Hinden > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Working on my 6man status slides. I noticed > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9812 it > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian’s approval. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that correct? > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2025, at 11:06 PM, Brian E > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's fine Sandy, thanks. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01-Jul-25 09:04, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brian, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2025, at 1:30 PM, Brian E > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Sandy. You still have me listed as > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be clear, I have approved everything > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pending > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes to the registry titles - I guess > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you'd > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do a > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final check when that is done? > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for not being clear — I didn’t see an > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explicit > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from you, so I thought you might want to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry titles have been updated. I’m > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopeful > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimum, don’t mind being on the hook to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updates are correct and there are no > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerns > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> naming > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conventions. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any concerns > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01-Jul-25 04:00, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi David and Brian, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your replies. David, we > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval on the AUTH48 page > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9812>. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will notify you when the updates to the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> titles are complete. Our understanding is > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently under discussion. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 2025, at 9:05 PM, David Farmer > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did receive the original email. I have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes, and they look good to me. It can > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the IANA registry titles are updated. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 3:13 PM Sandy > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ginoza > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Suresh, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your review and for letting > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not receive the original AUTH48 mail. We > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval on the AUTH48 page > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9812> and will > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication once approvals and updates to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registry > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> titles are complete. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2025, at 12:59 PM, Suresh > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Krishnan > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sandy, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work on this. I also > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian, have not received the original > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail. I > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest version and it looks good. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consider > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:00 PM Sandy > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ginoza > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brian, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your review. We have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document as > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> described below and posted the updated > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.xml > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.txt > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.pdf > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48 diffs: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48diff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comprehensive diffs: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9812- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rfcdiff.html > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few notes: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - We are unsure why the initial AUTH48 > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received. Thank you for letting us > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know; > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> track > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether there are ongoing issues. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Regarding your name, if you prefer "B. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter”, we > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are happy to update this document and > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moving > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward. Please let us know your > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Regarding "I assume the IANA and RFC > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actions > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be done just before the actual > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication.” > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IANA > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already updated the registration > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> procedure. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with IANA in the background to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinate > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updates > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the registry titles. I expect you > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delay > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication of this RFC until the titles > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so the document can be updated > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordingly. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let me > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know if this assumption is incorrect. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 26, 2025, at 2:02 PM, Brian E > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have read the various versions and > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diffs, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and for me this is all good. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I assume the IANA and RFC Editor > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actions > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just before the actual publication.) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other answers in line below. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks much > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brian Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27-Jun-25 06:21, Sandy Ginoza wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings authors, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that we await your review > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9812. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know how you would like > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> items below. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor/sg > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2025, at 4:38 PM, rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor@rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Authors, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve (as necessary) > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following questions, which are > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XML > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) <!--[rfced] This document has been > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned a > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new BCP > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number. However, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is unclear whether this document > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grouped > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an existing BCP. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the list of BCPs > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if the newly > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned BCP number is correct or if > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to an existing BCP. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See the complete list of BCPs here: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcps > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a slight relationship with BCP > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 153 > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think a > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new BCP number > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appropriate. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Brian, we have > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> header as shown below > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to match what appears in the header > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFCs > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you've > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authored. Please > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let us know if you prefer otherwise. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original: B. E. Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current: B. Carpenter > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's fine. A bit too late to change > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keywords > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (beyond > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that appear in > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the title) for use on > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc- > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/search. > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Regarding the RFC > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
