Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> wrote: > So,, let's use a "MUST NOT" as we all want all DHCPv6 servers moving to > RFC 9915, this will be an incentive to implementors to clean up their > code by removing this function (if they had it).
I don't think it will push any implementation to change. I don't care SHOULD NOT vs MUST NOT :-) It might guide new implementations, but I doubt there will be any.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
