Hi, Bow-Nan. No worries. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 Thank you! Lynne Bartholomew RFC Production Center > On Dec 18, 2025, at 6:12 PM, Cheng, Bow-Nan - 0662 - MITLL > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm fine with this -- apologies for the delay > > On 12/15/25, 1:52 PM, "Lynne Bartholomew" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > !-------------------------------------------------------------------| > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside the Laboratory. > |-------------------------------------------------------------------! > > > Dear Bow-Nan, > > > A reminder that we do not believe that we have heard from you regarding the > status of this document. Please let us know whether further updates are > needed or you approve this document for publication in its current form. > > > The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side by side) > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> > > > The AUTH48 status page is here: > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> > > > Thank you! > > > Lynne Bartholomew > RFC Production Center > > >> On Dec 8, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Dear Bow-Nan, >> >> Checking in with you regarding the status of this document. Please let us >> know whether further updates are needed or you approve this document for >> publication in its current form. >> >> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by >> side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side by side) >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >> >> The AUTH48 status page is here: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >> >> Thank you! >> >> Lynne Bartholomew >> RFC Production Center >> >>> On Dec 4, 2025, at 8:36 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Donald. Thank you for the quick reply! We have updated accordingly. >>> >>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >>> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by side) >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by >>> side) >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side by side) >>> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>> >>> Thanks again! >>> >>> Lynne Bartholomew >>> RFC Production Center >>> >>>> On Dec 3, 2025, at 9:52 AM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:48 AM Lynne Bartholomew >>>> <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear authors, >>>>> >>>>> The authors of companion document RFC-to-be 9893 have changed 'logical >>>>> "Credit Window(s)"' to 'logical "credit window(s)"', because they went >>>>> with lowercase "credit window(s)" where this term is used generally. >>>>> >>>>> For consistency within this group of DLEP documents, may we change >>>>> 'logical "Credit Windows"' to 'logical "credit windows"' in this document >>>>> as well? >>>> >>>> I am OK with changing to lowercase. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Donald >>>> =============================== >>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Currently: >>>>> ... Flow control is provided using one or more logical "Credit Windows", >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 12:52 PM, Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Lou. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much! If you'll be celebrating the long weekend, we hope >>>>>> you have a good one! >>>>>> >>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 9:05 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected] >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks good to me too - thank you! >>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>> On November 25, 2025 1:36:45 PM Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. >>>>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 >>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help with this document! >>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Lynne, >>>>>>>>> I have reviewed this rfc-to-be and approve publication. >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Donald >>>>>>>>> =============================== >>>>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >>>>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:15 PM Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. We have changed "composed of" to "built on" per your note >>>>>>>>> in email for RFC-to-be 9895: >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Should "composed of" be changed to "built on" in RFC-to-be 9894 >>>>>>>>>>> as well, as was done per your first note further below for this >>>>>>>>>>> document? >>>>>>>>>>> From the latest rfc9894.txt: >>>>>>>>>>> The extension defined in this document is composed of the mechanisms >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Donald: Yes, I think the change should be made in RFC-to-be 9894 as >>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>>>>>> side) >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side >>>>>>>>> by side) >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side >>>>>>>>> by side) >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2025, at 11:24 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. Thank you for your prompt reply! We have updated this >>>>>>>>>> document per your notes below. >>>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>>>>>>> side) >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> >>>>>>>>>> (side by side) >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks again! >>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2025, at 6:37 PM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 5:08 PM <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Authors, >>>>>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary) the following questions, which are also in the source >>>>>>>>>>>> file. >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Document title: FYI, for ease of the reader and >>>>>>>>>>>> per our >>>>>>>>>>>> process, we expanded "DLEP" in the title. Please review. >>>>>>>>>>>> Original: >>>>>>>>>>>> DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension >>>>>>>>>>>> Currently: >>>>>>>>>>>> Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Diffserv Aware Credit Window >>>>>>>>>>>> Extension >>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> OK. >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that >>>>>>>>>>>> appear in the >>>>>>>>>>>> title) for use on <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search>>. --> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of any other good keywords. >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) <!-- [rfced] For ease of the reader, we expanded "CLI" where >>>>>>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>>>>>> used, per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide" - >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322>>). Please review, and >>>>>>>>>>>> let us know any objections. >>>>>>>>>>>> CLI: Command-Line Interface --> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Since it appears the "CLI" is used only once, I suggest deleting >>>>>>>>>>> "(CLI)" and just saying "Command-Line Interface". >>>>>>>>>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Section 3: We changed "the mismatch of >>>>>>>>>>>> capabilities" to >>>>>>>>>>>> "any mismatch in capabilities" per >>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension. Please let us know >>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>> objections. >>>>>>>>>>>> Original: >>>>>>>>>>>> In either case, the mismatch of capabilities SHOULD be >>>>>>>>>>>> reported to the user via normal network management mechanisms such >>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>> user interface messages or error logging. >>>>>>>>>>>> Currently: >>>>>>>>>>>> In either case, any mismatch in capabilities SHOULD be >>>>>>>>>>>> reported to the user via normal network management mechanisms, such >>>>>>>>>>>> as user interface messages or error logging. --> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> OK. Consistency with ether-credit-extension is good. >>>>>>>>>>>> 5) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> online Style Guide at >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>>, >>>>>>>>>>>> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature >>>>>>>>>>>> typically result in more precise language, which is helpful for >>>>>>>>>>>> readers. >>>>>>>>>>>> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this >>>>>>>>>>>> should still be reviewed as a best practice. --> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do not think any changes are needed for this reason. >>>>>>>>>>>> 6) <!-- [rfced] Please let us know if any changes are needed for >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> following: >>>>>>>>>>>> a) The following term was used inconsistently in this document. >>>>>>>>>>>> We chose to use the latter form. Please let us know any objections. >>>>>>>>>>>> Sub-Data item / Sub-Data Item (as used elsewhere in this document >>>>>>>>>>>> and per the other documents in this group (Cluster 541 / >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C541 >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C541>) of >>>>>>>>>>>> documents) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Use of the all-caps version is fine. >>>>>>>>>>>> b) The following term appears to be used inconsistently in this >>>>>>>>>>>> document. >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know which form is preferred. (Note that we updated >>>>>>>>>>>> "DiffServ" >>>>>>>>>>>> to "Diffserv" in the document already.) >>>>>>>>>>>> DiffServ Aware Credit Window Type Value / >>>>>>>>>>>> DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension Type Value --> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Probably best to go with the more explicit version including the >>>>>>>>>>> word >>>>>>>>>>> "Extension". >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Donald >>>>>>>>>>> =============================== >>>>>>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >>>>>>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew and Rebecca VanRheenen >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2025, at 2:05 PM, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> *****IMPORTANT***** >>>>>>>>>>>> Updated 2025/11/14 >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Author(s): >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48 >>>>>>>>>>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and >>>>>>>>>>>> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies >>>>>>>>>>>> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/ >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/>). >>>>>>>>>>>> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties >>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing >>>>>>>>>>>> your approval. >>>>>>>>>>>> Planning your review >>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the following aspects of your document: >>>>>>>>>>>> * RFC Editor questions >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor >>>>>>>>>>>> that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as >>>>>>>>>>>> follows: >>>>>>>>>>>> <!-- [rfced] ... --> >>>>>>>>>>>> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. >>>>>>>>>>>> * Changes submitted by coauthors >>>>>>>>>>>> Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your >>>>>>>>>>>> coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you >>>>>>>>>>>> agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. >>>>>>>>>>>> * Content >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot >>>>>>>>>>>> change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular attention >>>>>>>>>>>> to: >>>>>>>>>>>> - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) >>>>>>>>>>>> - contact information >>>>>>>>>>>> - references >>>>>>>>>>>> * Copyright notices and legends >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions >>>>>>>>>>>> (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info>). >>>>>>>>>>>> * Semantic markup >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of >>>>>>>>>>>> content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that <sourcecode> >>>>>>>>>>>> and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>>. >>>>>>>>>>>> * Formatted output >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the >>>>>>>>>>>> formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is >>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting >>>>>>>>>>>> limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. >>>>>>>>>>>> Submitting changes >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as >>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The >>>>>>>>>>>> parties >>>>>>>>>>>> include: >>>>>>>>>>>> * your coauthors >>>>>>>>>>>> * [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> (the RPC team) >>>>>>>>>>>> * other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., >>>>>>>>>>>> IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the >>>>>>>>>>>> responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). >>>>>>>>>>>> * [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>, which is a new archival >>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion >>>>>>>>>>>> list: >>>>>>>>>>>> * More info: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The archive itself: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out >>>>>>>>>>>> of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter). >>>>>>>>>>>> If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you >>>>>>>>>>>> have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> will be re-added to the CC list and >>>>>>>>>>>> its addition will be noted at the top of the message. >>>>>>>>>>>> You may submit your changes in one of two ways: >>>>>>>>>>>> An update to the provided XML file >>>>>>>>>>>> — OR — >>>>>>>>>>>> An explicit list of changes in this format >>>>>>>>>>>> Section # (or indicate Global) >>>>>>>>>>>> OLD: >>>>>>>>>>>> old text >>>>>>>>>>>> NEW: >>>>>>>>>>>> new text >>>>>>>>>>>> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an >>>>>>>>>>>> explicit >>>>>>>>>>>> list of changes, as either form is sufficient. >>>>>>>>>>>> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes >>>>>>>>>>>> that seem >>>>>>>>>>>> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion >>>>>>>>>>>> of text, >>>>>>>>>>>> and technical changes. Information about stream managers can be >>>>>>>>>>>> found in >>>>>>>>>>>> the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream >>>>>>>>>>>> manager. >>>>>>>>>>>> Approving for publication >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email >>>>>>>>>>>> stating >>>>>>>>>>>> that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, >>>>>>>>>>>> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval. >>>>>>>>>>>> Files >>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>>>>> The files are available here: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>>>>>>>> Diff file of the text: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>>>>>>>>> side) >>>>>>>>>>>> Diff of the XML: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tracking progress >>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your cooperation, >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC9894 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-21) >>>>>>>>>>>> Title : DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension >>>>>>>>>>>> Author(s) : B. Cheng, D. Wiggins, L. Berger, D. Eastlake 3rd, Ed. >>>>>>>>>>>> WG Chair(s) : Don Fedyk, Ronald in 't Velt, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd >>>>>>>>>>>> Area Director(s) : Jim Guichard, Ketan Talaulikar, Gunter Van de >>>>>>>>>>>> Velde >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
