Hi, These change is complete:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/dlep-parameters thanks, Amanda On Mon Dec 22 17:10:57 2025, [email protected] wrote: > Dear IANA, > > We have all author approvals for this document. > > Please make the following update on > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dlep-parameters/>, in the "Extension > Type Values" registry: > > OLD: DiffServ Aware Credit Window > > NEW: Diffserv Aware Credit Window > > Thank you! > > Lynne Bartholomew > RFC Production Center > > > On Dec 22, 2025, at 8:57 AM, Lynne Bartholomew > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, Bow-Nan. > > > > No worries. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: > > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 > > > > Thank you! > > > > Lynne Bartholomew > > RFC Production Center > > > >> On Dec 18, 2025, at 6:12 PM, Cheng, Bow-Nan - 0662 - MITLL > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I'm fine with this -- apologies for the delay > >> > >> On 12/15/25, 1:52 PM, "Lynne Bartholomew" <[email protected] > >> editor.org <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> !------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> | > >> This Message Is From an External Sender > >> This message came from outside the Laboratory. > >> |------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ! > >> > >> > >> Dear Bow-Nan, > >> > >> > >> A reminder that we do not believe that we have heard from you > >> regarding the status of this document. Please let us know whether > >> further updates are needed or you approve this document for > >> publication in its current form. > >> > >> > >> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: > >> > >> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt <https://www.rfc- > >> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf <https://www.rfc- > >> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html <https://www.rfc- > >> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml <https://www.rfc- > >> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by > >> side) > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> > >> (side by side) > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side > >> by side) > >> > >> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html > >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> > >> > >> > >> The AUTH48 status page is here: > >> > >> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- > >> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> > >> > >> > >> Thank you! > >> > >> > >> Lynne Bartholomew > >> RFC Production Center > >> > >> > >>> On Dec 8, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Lynne Bartholomew > >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > >>> editor.org>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear Bow-Nan, > >>> > >>> Checking in with you regarding the status of this document. Please > >>> let us know whether further updates are needed or you approve this > >>> document for publication in its current form. > >>> > >>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: > >>> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt <https://www.rfc- > >>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf <https://www.rfc- > >>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html <https://www.rfc- > >>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml <https://www.rfc- > >>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by > >>> side) > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> > >>> (side by side) > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side > >>> by side) > >>> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html > >>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> > >>> > >>> The AUTH48 status page is here: > >>> > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- > >>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> > >>> > >>> Thank you! > >>> > >>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>> RFC Production Center > >>> > >>>> On Dec 4, 2025, at 8:36 AM, Lynne Bartholomew > >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > >>>> editor.org>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, Donald. Thank you for the quick reply! We have updated > >>>> accordingly. > >>>> > >>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: > >>>> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt <https://www.rfc- > >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf <https://www.rfc- > >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html <https://www.rfc- > >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml <https://www.rfc- > >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by > >>>> side) > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> > >>>> (side by side) > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> > >>>> (side by side) > >>>> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html > >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks again! > >>>> > >>>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>>> RFC Production Center > >>>> > >>>>> On Dec 3, 2025, at 9:52 AM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:48 AM Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dear authors, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The authors of companion document RFC-to-be 9893 have changed > >>>>>> 'logical "Credit Window(s)"' to 'logical "credit window(s)"', > >>>>>> because they went with lowercase "credit window(s)" where this > >>>>>> term is used generally. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For consistency within this group of DLEP documents, may we > >>>>>> change 'logical "Credit Windows"' to 'logical "credit windows"' > >>>>>> in this document as well? > >>>>> > >>>>> I am OK with changing to lowercase. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Donald > >>>>> =============================== > >>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > >>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Currently: > >>>>>> ... Flow control is provided using one or more logical "Credit > >>>>>> Windows", > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thank you! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>> RFC Production Center > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 12:52 PM, Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, Lou. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thank you very much! If you'll be celebrating the long weekend, > >>>>>>> we hope you have a good one! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 9:05 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Looks good to me too - thank you! > >>>>>>>> Lou > >>>>>>>> ---------- > >>>>>>>> On November 25, 2025 1:36:45 PM Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. > >>>>>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: > >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> > >>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help with this document! > >>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Donald Eastlake > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Lynne, > >>>>>>>>>> I have reviewed this rfc-to-be and approve publication. > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Donald > >>>>>>>>>> =============================== > >>>>>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > >>>>>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:15 PM Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. We have changed "composed of" to "built on" per > >>>>>>>>>> your note in email for RFC-to-be 9895: > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Should "composed of" be changed to "built on" in RFC- > >>>>>>>>>>>> to-be 9894 > >>>>>>>>>>>> as well, as was done per your first note further below for > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>> document? > >>>>>>>>>>>> From the latest rfc9894.txt: > >>>>>>>>>>>> The extension defined in this document is composed of the > >>>>>>>>>>>> mechanisms > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Donald: Yes, I think the change should be made in RFC-to-be > >>>>>>>>>>> 9894 as well. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your > >>>>>>>>>> browser: > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> > >>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- > >>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html <https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by > >>>>>>>>>> side) > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- > >>>>>>>>>> lastrfcdiff.html> (side by side) > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html > >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> > >>>>>>>>>> Thank you! > >>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2025, at 11:24 AM, Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. Thank you for your prompt reply! We have > >>>>>>>>>>> updated this document per your notes below. > >>>>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your > >>>>>>>>>>> browser: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- > >>>>>>>>>>> auth48diff.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- > >>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html <https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by > >>>>>>>>>>> side) > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again! > >>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew > >>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2025, at 6:37 PM, Donald Eastlake > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 5:08 PM <[email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Authors, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please > >>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve (as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary) the following questions, which are also in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> source > >>>>>>>>>>>>> file. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Document title: FYI, for ease of the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reader and per our > >>>>>>>>>>>>> process, we expanded "DLEP" in the title. Please review. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Original: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Diffserv Aware > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Extension > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> OK. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that appear in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> title) for use on <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search>>. --> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of any other good keywords. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) <!-- [rfced] For ease of the reader, we expanded "CLI" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> where first > >>>>>>>>>>>>> used, per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide" - > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322>>). Please > >>>>>>>>>>>>> review, and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> let us know any objections. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CLI: Command-Line Interface --> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Since it appears the "CLI" is used only once, I suggest > >>>>>>>>>>>> deleting > >>>>>>>>>>>> "(CLI)" and just saying "Command-Line Interface". > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Section 3: We changed "the mismatch of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> capabilities" to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "any mismatch in capabilities" per > >>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension. Please let > >>>>>>>>>>>>> us know any > >>>>>>>>>>>>> objections. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Original: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In either case, the mismatch of capabilities SHOULD be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reported to the user via normal network management > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanisms such as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> user interface messages or error logging. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In either case, any mismatch in capabilities SHOULD be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reported to the user via normal network management > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanisms, such > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as user interface messages or error logging. --> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Consistency with ether-credit-extension is good. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> portion of the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> online Style Guide at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this nature > >>>>>>>>>>>>> typically result in more precise language, which is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> helpful for > >>>>>>>>>>>>> readers. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that our script did not flag any words in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> particular, but this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should still be reviewed as a best practice. --> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I do not think any changes are needed for this reason. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6) <!-- [rfced] Please let us know if any changes are > >>>>>>>>>>>>> needed for the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> following: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a) The following term was used inconsistently in this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> document. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We chose to use the latter form. Please let us know any > >>>>>>>>>>>>> objections. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sub-Data item / Sub-Data Item (as used elsewhere in this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> document > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and per the other documents in this group (Cluster 541 / > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C541 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C541>) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of documents) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Use of the all-caps version is fine. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> b) The following term appears to be used inconsistently > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in this document. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know which form is preferred. (Note that we > >>>>>>>>>>>>> updated "DiffServ" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to "Diffserv" in the document already.) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DiffServ Aware Credit Window Type Value / > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension Type Value --> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably best to go with the more explicit version > >>>>>>>>>>>> including the word > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Extension". > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Donald > >>>>>>>>>>>> =============================== > >>>>>>>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew and Rebecca VanRheenen > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2025, at 2:05 PM, [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *****IMPORTANT***** > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Updated 2025/11/14 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Author(s): > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as an RFC. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If an author is no longer available, there are several > >>>>>>>>>>>>> remedies > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/faq/ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/>). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other > >>>>>>>>>>>>> parties > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before > >>>>>>>>>>>>> providing > >>>>>>>>>>>>> your approval. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Planning your review > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the following aspects of your document: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * RFC Editor questions > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that have been included in the XML file as comments > >>>>>>>>>>>>> marked as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <!-- [rfced] ... --> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Changes submitted by coauthors > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by > >>>>>>>>>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>>>>> coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you > >>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Content > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the full content of the document, as this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot > >>>>>>>>>>>>> change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular > >>>>>>>>>>>>> attention to: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - contact information > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - references > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Copyright notices and legends > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info>). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Semantic markup > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> elements of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <sourcecode> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>>. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Formatted output > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML > >>>>>>>>>>>>> file, is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting > >>>>>>>>>>>>> limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Submitting changes > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To submit changes, please reply to this email using > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘REPLY ALL’ as all > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the parties CCed on this message need to see your > >>>>>>>>>>>>> changes. The parties > >>>>>>>>>>>>> include: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * your coauthors > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * [email protected] <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> (the RPC team) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * other document participants, depending on the stream > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., > >>>>>>>>>>>>> IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * [email protected] <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org>, which is a new archival mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active > >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>>> list: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * More info: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * The archive itself: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily > >>>>>>>>>>>>> opt out > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive matter). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If needed, please add a note at the top of the message > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that you > >>>>>>>>>>>>> have dropped the address. When the discussion is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> concluded, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> will be re-added to the CC list and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> its addition will be noted at the top of the message. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You may submit your changes in one of two ways: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> An update to the provided XML file > >>>>>>>>>>>>> — OR — > >>>>>>>>>>>>> An explicit list of changes in this format > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Section # (or indicate Global) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> OLD: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> old text > >>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> new text > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and an explicit > >>>>>>>>>>>>> list of changes, as either form is sufficient. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any > >>>>>>>>>>>>> changes that seem > >>>>>>>>>>>>> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> deletion of text, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and technical changes. Information about stream managers > >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be found in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> stream manager. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Approving for publication > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> email stating > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘REPLY ALL’, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your > >>>>>>>>>>>>> approval. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Files > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The files are available here: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Diff file of the text: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Diff of the XML: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> xmldiff1.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tracking progress > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are > >>>>>>>>>>>>> here: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your cooperation, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC9894 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-21) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Title : DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Author(s) : B. Cheng, D. Wiggins, L. Berger, D. Eastlake > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd, Ed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> WG Chair(s) : Don Fedyk, Ronald in 't Velt, Donald E. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eastlake 3rd > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Area Director(s) : Jim Guichard, Ketan Talaulikar, Gunter > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Van de Velde > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
