Madison Church <[email protected]> wrote: > David - Thank you for your reply! We have updated the document with > your suggestion and noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page (see > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9908).
Thank you.
I've reviewed the changes, and I think they are all good improvements.
> The files have been posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by
> side)
...
> We have received all necessary approvals and we are almost ready to
> prepare this document for publication. Note that we are still
> conversing with RPAT regarding the addition of "base64-encoded-der" to
> the sourcecode-types list. Once we reach a solution, we will update the
> document accordingly.
I don't feel strongly for that name, or that it really is a "sourcecode"
It's example data, but I guess we are marking that as sourcecode.
The short is that for me, anything that gets the document out the door is
fine :-)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
