Madison Church <[email protected]> wrote: > Per internal discussion with RPAT, we have added "base64" to the list > of sourcecode types. Thus, we have left the sourcecode types as is in > sections 5.1.1, 5.2.1, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1, and 5.6. We did not include > DER, as we believe we should avoid indicating what is inside the > base64.
> We ask that at least one author verify that base64 is acceptable before
> moving forward with the publication process.
I didn't read emails in best order :-)
Marking it as base64 is acceptable, if not perfect.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
