Thanks for clarifying and making the request to the RSAB explicit in this thread. One small quibble right at the end of your message:
> This leaves a possible process hole in terms of potentially disruptive > behavior. There is two questions for the RSAB: > • Does this issue warrant holding draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates > for the RSWG to consider the issue? (Y/N/IDK) > • In case of "I don't know", would you like to discuss the issue? > One possibility is that we leave this for a short follow-up draft. ... if any need arises. The need for the MODPOD draft is immediate and obvious; I propose that the need for this in the RSWG is yet to be established. --Paul Hoffman -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
