Hi Alexis: An answer and a question:
On 07.01.2026 01:40, Alexis Rossi wrote:
I'm confused about why we would wait for draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes to be published. When we reference an RFC, isn't it already implied that we mean "this RFC and any future updates"?
Not generally, because for protocol specifications that might not be correct. Here we actually use that phrase in regard to RFC 2418 in one place, but NOT in another.
The question: how would the authors expect disruptive behavior to be handled in the RSWG, if / when it occurs? This is really the meat of the issue.
Eliot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
