Hello Paul and Alexis,

We have converted the kramdown-rfc file to RFCXML. 

Please review the XML file and its TXT, HTML, and PDF outputs, and let us know 
if any changes are required or if you approve the RFC for publication. We 
consider this your final assent that the document is ready for publication. To 
request changes or approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this 
email. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, as all the parties CCed on this message need to 
see your approval.

Note that we will only make changes in the XML file from this point on.

XML file:
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9920.xml

Output files:
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9920.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9920.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9920.pdf

Comprehensive diff file of the text:
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9920-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9920-rfcdiff.html (side by side)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9920

Thank you,

Rebecca VanRheenen
RFC Production Center



> On Jan 30, 2026, at 5:25 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Jan 30, 2026, at 17:06, Rebecca VanRheenen 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Paul and Alexis,
>> 
>> We’ve merged both pull requests for RFC-to-be 9920. Are any further updates 
>> needed?
> 
> Nope! I have done a visual diff between the rfc9920.md and the version turned 
> into you, and believe everything looks fine. Thanks for the careful review: 
> you made some really good wording changes.
> 
>> We need an acknowledgement from at least one author before converting the 
>> markdown file to XML.
> 
> Ack! (And I won't spell it out because you'll correct my spelling even though 
> both are acceptable....)
> 
> --Paul Hoffman


-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to