Hi John, Thank you for your reply!
Sincerely, Sarah Tarrant RFC Production Center > On May 11, 2026, at 1:29 PM, John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1) As there may have been multiple updates made to the document during Last >> Call, >> please review the current version of the document: >> >> * Is the text in the Abstract still accurate? > > Per discussion with ADs, please add this (or something similar) to the > abstract: > > This document updates RFC4021 to extend the usage of the header field. > >> * Are the Authors' Addresses, Contributors, and Acknowledgments >> sections current? > > Yes. > >> 2) Please share any style information that could help us with editing your >> document. For example: > > It's very short, intended to stand on its own. > >> 3) Please carefully review the entries and their URLs in the >> References section with the following in mind. Note that we will >> update as follows unless we hear otherwise at this time: > > They look OK. The reference to RFC822 is deliberate even though it's been > obsoleted. The reference to RFC5322 might be updated if 5322bis is published > first but the text is the same so there's no need to wait. > >> 4) Is there any text that requires special handling? > > Not that I can think of. > >> 5) Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for editing in >> kramdown-rfc? > > No, we used mmark > >> 6) Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for completing AUTH48 >> in >> GitHub? > > Sorry no. > >> 7) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while editing this >> document? > > No and thanks. > > Regards, > John Levine -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
