Hi Med, On 5/19/26 09:31, [email protected] wrote:
When reviewing the full diff, I noticed this part that I think can be simplified a bit:CURRENT: For ingesting CSYNC records, Section 3.1 of [RFC7477] advocates that Parental Agents limit queries to a single authoritative nameserver (as done in normal resolution). [RFC7344] (on CDS/CDNSKEY) has a corresponding section (Section 6.1 of [RFC7344]) that contains no provision for how specifically queries for these records should be done. For example, NEW: For ingesting CSYNC records, Section 3.1 of [RFC7477] advocates that Parental Agents limit queries to a single authoritative nameserver (as done in normal resolution). However, Section 6.1 of [RFC7344] contains no provision for how specifically queries for these records should be done.
In fact, the "complication" was proposed by the RFC Editor, as 7477 is on CSYNC and 7344 on CDS/CDNSKEY, but only the former is pointed out. Without context on CDS/CDNSKEY, this is incomprehensible. I agree that the current text is not particularly smooth, but I can live with it. I'm also fine when this is resolved some other way (but I don't have a good proposal). Thanks, Peter -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
