Hi Med, Sounds good.
As we have approvals from both you and Peter, once we hear back about the draft (draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-automation) being updated, this document will be ready to move forward in the publication process. We’ve changed the state to AUTH48-DONE, but will await word (likely on Friday 22 May) regarding the reference. Thank you. Megan Ferguson RFC Production Center > On May 19, 2026, at 12:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Re-, > > Let's park that update. > > I have already approved the other parts. > > Thanks Megan. > > Cheers, > Med > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Megan Ferguson <[email protected]> >> Envoyé : mardi 19 mai 2026 18:44 >> À : Peter Thomassen | SSE <[email protected]> >> Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; dnsop- >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Objet : Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9975 <draft-ietf-dnsop-cds- >> consistency-11> for your review >> >> >> Hi Peter and Med, >> >> Thanks for passing this along; we have noted the possible delay on >> the AUTH48 status page (see below). >> >> It didn’t sound like Med’s suggested update had consensus between >> the two of you. We will hold off on any updates to that text >> until we hear further. >> >> No updates have been made to the past versions of the files, just >> including links here for convenience. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc- >> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai >> r%40orange.com%7C52869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40 >> bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639148058772691566%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG >> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs >> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9%2FRD7%2BUa3L >> OzJcUMjM%2BE2EMLcjpZH9ZuIG1MLrGvt3k%3D&reserved=0 >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc- >> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai >> r%40orange.com%7C52869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40 >> bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639148058772709585%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG >> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs >> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Aka7LGWn%2BPwe >> BLomIuyjKU0%2BoG%2BW9OgcqiGmCy3zJL4%3D&reserved=0 >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc- >> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada >> ir%40orange.com%7C52869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b4 >> 0bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639148058772720836%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb >> GZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI >> sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fMMzlz%2Fm80d >> eAyPzH7z51qyPjv4WJGDlwYQgtWejwow%3D&reserved=0 >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc- >> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai >> r%40orange.com%7C52869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40 >> bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639148058772732150%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG >> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs >> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Pky9BugPuWnn%2 >> FGsfBkmIuov2omr0xRvkSgUHlHsNX7s%3D&reserved=0 >> >> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh): >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975- >> diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C52869a57 >> 41224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C >> 0%7C639148058772742375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR >> ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyf >> Q%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Fw2w%2BvnKmAK6Vc8aVuMihE4X%2FisHfmWRa >> Mz0hUqgHTs%3D&reserved=0 (comprehensive) >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975- >> rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C52869 >> a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0 >> %7C0%7C639148058772752893%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki >> OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIj >> oyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ro9wD4l3%2Fic0kwHUC8wa24TZVZMioR46o% >> 2BQf9ankpD8%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) >> >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975- >> auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C52 >> 869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20% >> 7C0%7C0%7C639148058772763180%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hc >> GkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIld >> UIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=j2dZ45a6t2kB7ONTAHj%2B5ovFFM9PoB% >> 2BakIqlTnm3wPg%3D&reserved=0 (AUTH48 changes only) >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975- >> auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7 >> C52869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >> 20%7C0%7C0%7C639148058772773100%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU >> 1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIs >> IldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UchN6lFObVpDIE1ZvV%2Fh4T2jINnq >> Ox5ohPuQGlp5Zm4%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) >> >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975- >> lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C5286 >> 9a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C >> 0%7C0%7C639148058772787295%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGk >> iOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUI >> joyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QjPJtk9BzF8kyVphB%2FAa1VGel4dYY8b75 >> NSKe9VZ0EA%3D&reserved=0 (last version to this) >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9975- >> lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C5 >> 2869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20 >> %7C0%7C0%7C639148058772800757%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1h >> cGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIl >> dUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WgckSEzT1Wy5JXYfyrhtW42iXViabLz3 >> jFZPCSXZn3U%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) >> >> The AUTH48 status page for this document is available here: >> >> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >> www.rfc- >> editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9975&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o >> range.com%7C52869a5741224ff37cff08deb5c5e824%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4 >> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639148058772812269%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d >> 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI >> joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WFgUmf8cyRk5JZTjPt% >> 2FtDTod0VYkivlY62vG%2FbYEwbQ%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Thank you. >> >> Megan Ferguson >> RFC Production Center >> >>> Hi Megan, >>> >>> This document (non-normatively) references draft-ietf-dnsop-ds- >> automation. >>> >>> Please hold off publishing RFC 9975 for a few days as a new >> revision of that draft is expected, and it would be nice if the >> informative reference in RFC 9975 pointed to the most stable >> version. >>> >>> I'll let you know when the reference is stable (probably >> Friday). >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Best, >>> Peter >> >>> On May 19, 2026, at 3:23 AM, Peter Thomassen | SSE >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Med, >>> >>> On 5/19/26 09:31, [email protected] wrote: >>>> When reviewing the full diff, I noticed this part that I think >> can be simplified a bit: >>>> CURRENT: >>>> For ingesting CSYNC records, Section 3.1 of [RFC7477] >> advocates that >>>> Parental Agents limit queries to a single authoritative >> nameserver >>>> (as done in normal resolution). [RFC7344] (on CDS/CDNSKEY) >> has a >>>> corresponding section (Section 6.1 of [RFC7344]) that >> contains no >>>> provision for how specifically queries for these records >> should be >>>> done. >>>> For example, >>>> NEW: >>>> For ingesting CSYNC records, Section 3.1 of [RFC7477] >> advocates that >>>> Parental Agents limit queries to a single authoritative >> nameserver >>>> (as done in normal resolution). However, Section 6.1 of >> [RFC7344] contains no >>>> provision for how specifically queries for these records >> should be >>>> done. >>> >>> In fact, the "complication" was proposed by the RFC Editor, as >> 7477 is on CSYNC and 7344 on CDS/CDNSKEY, but only the former is >> pointed out. Without context on CDS/CDNSKEY, this is >> incomprehensible. >>> >>> I agree that the current text is not particularly smooth, but I >> can live with it. I'm also fine when this is resolved some other >> way (but I don't have a good proposal). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Peter > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
