Hi Julian and Mike, We have updated the document so the text now appears as:
The media type used in most examples is "application/x-www-form- urlencoded" (as used in POST requests from browser user clients, defined in "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" (https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#application/x-www-form-urlencoded) in [URL]). The updated files are available here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008.html Diffs highlighting only the most recent update: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) Final Review diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Comprehensive diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10008-rfcdiff.html (side by side) Thanks for catching that the update was missing — I’ll have to review the repo to figure out what happened. With this update, we believe Julian approves the RFC for publication and have noted his approval. Mike, please review and let us know if any further updates are needed or if you approve the RFC for publication. Thank you, Sandy Ginoza RFC Production Center > On Jun 10, 2026, at 4:09 AM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 10.06.2026 um 11:08 schrieb Mike Bishop: >> Well, I replied on the GitHub comment. But yes, I think that's it. It's > > To actually progress, you'll need to send approval. > >> not convenient right now to confirm whether that's a stable anchor in URL, >> but I'd be surprised if it hasn't been referenced many time over before. > > URL ref is stable, FETCH is not (yet). As the latter one is informative only > anyway, we can just remove the section reference. > > So, to clarify: > > I approve publication once the minor nit re URL is resolved (for instance, > via https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10008/pull/22 -> > https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10008/pull/22/changes/75651954e980365c30b42286342a2d46a8f820ab). > > > Actually is was resolved earlier, but somehow that change was lost. > > Best regards, Julian -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
