Hi Alice, all, I disapprove the changes of the normative language in Section 3.7. Please revert these changes and add relevant boilerplate.
Thank you. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Alice Russo <[email protected]> > Envoyé : jeudi 18 juin 2026 00:18 > À : Carlos Pignataro <[email protected]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed > INNOV/NET <[email protected]> > Cc : Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Mahesh Jethanandani > <[email protected]>; RFC Editor <[email protected]>; > auth48archive <[email protected]> > Objet : AD - Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10014 (draft-ietf-opsawg- > oam-characterization) in XML > > > Carlos, Med (as AD), > > * Med, re: the lowercasing of the two SHOULDs, we await your reply > to this mail from Carlos (15 June): > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > mailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fauth48archive%2F5OFvsUA8GkPDXC > DGXC8LRyxWrjQ%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1 > 018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20 > %7C0%7C0%7C639173314907088795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1h > cGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIl > dUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CZi3Xp2Qkfd4KVIHOuRN0e6CH6zoapLW > 2IqR7Xrc7Co%3D&reserved=0 > > > Thank you for your reply, Carlos. Please see the follow-ups below. > The revised files are here (please refresh): > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucad > air%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b > 40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907104344%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMi > IsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=g9GSW2SLSsPp > f%2BJo88DXTLC9k4G7pTsCBOIuYWYKv0s%3D&reserved=0 > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada > ir%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b4 > 0bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907115270%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb > GZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI > sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=b%2FpcqGO8yAc > D%2FPsb%2FryIbEnepandZs%2FFQRgj5sSWuGI%3D&reserved=0 > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada > ir%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b4 > 0bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907127292%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb > GZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI > sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WbzZ14OICmPDg > IMMPAY2jnIlpRiGJGRlZI4HvpPT5L8%3D&reserved=0 > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada > ir%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b4 > 0bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907141910%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb > GZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI > sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9RDEbZqZ46VQP > 2iwO98Xq%2BkbJmwDPFgA7otrwFG%2FqlE%3D&reserved=0 > > This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28 > d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C > 0%7C639173314907152678%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR > ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyf > Q%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=M3yJDoRIZEadrtWxfzjsdgBM2otgBGObK1Kmlml > EbmI%3D&reserved=0 > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018b > b28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0 > %7C0%7C639173314907162895%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki > OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIj > oyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=uEPR%2Baxs3XIFJNUzKLRMuJYRRTbExvhuQf > NrbVeYc2A%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) > > This diff file shows the changes made during Final Review thus > far: > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C10 > 18bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20% > 7C0%7C0%7C639173314907173477%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hc > GkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIld > UIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3int1X1bvoxcQk3IHYOWxmx%2FnBtGcQC > 3BPSxc%2FZnVwo%3D&reserved=0 > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7 > C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d > 20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907183896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU > 1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIs > IldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ssOBT96joBTZmJCUoFd5V7FEtLNHmo > CJHgAHoJpv55A%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) > > > Re: #8, we added the sentence in Section 3.4. Please review. > Current: > > An example of "Equal-Forwarding-Treatment OAM" is presented in > [RFC9551] in the context of Deterministic Networking (DetNet) > OAM: > "it traverses the same set of links and interfaces receiving > the same > QoS and Packet Replication, Elimination, and Ordering Functions > (PREOF) treatment as the monitored DetNet flow". (The property > of > "Equal-Forwarding-Treatment" is referred to in [RFC9551] as > "In-band > OAM".) > > Re: #15 (Acknowledgements), removed duplicate as requested. FYI, > we added a hyphen in "Huang-Feng" because of Alex's recent reply > on this topic > (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fauth48archive%2FcNQMWS7FtV75D > RiiExd5Idx3m4E%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C > 1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d2 > 0%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907193853%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1 > hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsI > ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4TAO8ZFSS3aHpICLwfO3GnBPFojdQ3U > OEioUaZdK0zQ%3D&reserved=0). > > You wrote: > > After implementing these updates on this email thread, please > mark my Approval on this document. > > Approved. > > Your approval has been recorded. > > This page shows the Final Review status of your document: > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > queue.rfc-editor.org%2Ffinal- > review%2Frfc10014&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C > 1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d2 > 0%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907204229%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1 > hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsI > ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ulvn9Y8KOQhkGlIlbfdfJG6AawSEW4s > oR7myAgVbjt8%3D&reserved=0 > > Thank you. > > Alice Russo > RFC Production Center > > > On Jun 13, 2026, at 4:12 AM, Carlos Pignataro > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, Alice, > > > > Many thanks for this work, edits, and questions! > > > > Please find some responses inline. > > > > Additionally, I’d like to request these updates: > > > > 14. Grammo > > OLD: > > While this document introduces new terminology, it is does > not update > > or change the meaning of terminology found in existing RFCs. > > > > NEW: > > While this document introduces new terminology, it does not > update > > or change the meaning of terminology found in existing RFCs. > > > > 15. Duplicate > > OLD: > > The authors wish to thank, chronologically, Hesham Elbakoury, > Michael > > Richardson, Stewart Bryant, Greg Mirsky, Med Boucadair, Loa > > Andersson, Thomas Graf, Alex Huang Feng, Xiao Min, Dhruv > Dhody, Henk > > Birkholz, Alex Huang Feng, Tom Petch, Roni Even, Tim Chown, > Marcus > > Ihlar, Med Boucadair, Benoit Claise, Chongfeng Xie, Robert > Sparks, > > Kyle Rose, Mach Chen, Roman Danyliw, Gorry Fairhurst, Éric > Vyncke, > > Andy Newton, Deb Cooley, Ketan Talaulikar, and Gunter Van de > Velde > > for their thorough review and useful feedback comments that > greatly > > improved this document. > > > > NEW: > > The authors wish to thank, chronologically, Hesham Elbakoury, > Michael > > Richardson, Stewart Bryant, Greg Mirsky, Med Boucadair, Loa > > Andersson, Thomas Graf, Alex Huang Feng, Xiao Min, Dhruv > Dhody, Henk > > Birkholz, Tom Petch, Roni Even, Tim Chown, Marcus > > Ihlar, Med Boucadair, Benoit Claise, Chongfeng Xie, Robert > Sparks, > > Kyle Rose, Mach Chen, Roman Danyliw, Gorry Fairhurst, Éric > Vyncke, > > Andy Newton, Deb Cooley, Ketan Talaulikar, and Gunter Van de > Velde > > for their thorough review and useful feedback comments that > greatly > > improved this document. > > > > 16: Carlos’ email contact > > OLD: > > Carlos Pignataro > > Blue Fern Consulting > > United States of America > > Email: [email protected], [email protected] > > > > NEW: > > Carlos Pignataro > > Blue Fern Consulting > > United States of America > > Email: [email protected] > > > > More inline > > > >> On Jun 12, 2026, at 11:35 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> Authors, > >> > >> While reviewing this document during Final Review, please > resolve (as > >> necessary) the following questions, which are also in the > source file. > >> > >> 1. This document will become part of BCP 161 because it updates > RFC 6291. > >> If this is not correct (i.e., it should be assigned a new BCP > >> number), please let us know. > >> > >> See the complete list of BCPs here: > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc-editor.org%2Fbcp%2Fbcp- > index.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai > >> > r%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40 > bfb > >> > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907214139%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb > 3d8 > >> > eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIj > oiT > >> > WFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=N7C%2Bk%2Fe6xm1bY2jqi%2 > BCk > >> l613ZSR1HMoeIIa%2Baeo0yYk%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > Correct > > > >> > >> 2. Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in the > title) > >> for use on > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www.rfc- > editor.org%2Fsearch&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com% > 7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5 > d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907224081%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0e > U1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCI > sIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XBVRVrR3m6eVJ%2F5CErnN58q0qBI > D7YxM7n%2F63QyDBjI%3D&reserved=0. > >> > > > > > > Suggested keywords: OAM, in-band, out-of-band, path-congruent, > active > > OAM, passive OAM, hybrid OAM, in-data-packet, forwarding > treatment > > > >> > >> 3. We note that [RFC9341] uses "Alternate-Marking" rather than > >> "Alternate Marking". Should the hyphen be added here? > >> > >> Current: > >> Another example of "Hybrid Type I OAM" that is also "In-Data- > Packet > >> OAM" is Alternate Marking [RFC9341], when applied to data > packets of > >> a single stream. > >> > > > > No. We use “Alternate Marking” as a noun, “Alternate-Marking” as > > adjective. Same as RFC9341 ("Indeed, Alternate Marking can be)”, > "that > > Service Providers using Alternate Marking must do”, "Alternate- > Marking > > Method”, "Alternate-Marking technique”.) > > > > Please keep as is. > > > >> > >> 4. For clarity, what does "allowing for packet loss > computation" refer to? > >> > >> Original: > >> Instead, OAM > >> packets are used for carrying information about observed > network > >> characteristics, namely user packet counter values, allowing > for > >> packet loss computation. > >> > >> Option A (if characteristics allow for the computation): > >> Instead, OAM > >> packets are used for carrying information about observed > network > >> characteristics (namely, user packet counter values) allowing > for > >> packet loss computation. > >> > >> Option B (if values allow for the computation): > >> Instead, OAM > >> packets are used for carrying information about observed > network > >> characteristics - namely, user packet counter values that > allow for > >> packet loss computation. > > > > Option B > > > >> > >> > >> 5. For clarity, should "Path Followed OAM" be "Path-Followed > OAM" > >> or "Path-Following OAM"? This term has not appeared in any > RFCs, and > >> it appears only once in this document. > >> > > > > Please rename section 3.3 to be consistent with 3.4 and others > > > > OLD: > > 3.3. Path Followed OAM > > > > NEW: > > 3.3. Path-Congruent OAM > > > > > > > >> > >> 6. FYI, we added hyphens to the section title to make "3.4. > >> Packet-Forwarding-Treatment OAM" > >> similar to usage of "Equal-Forwarding-Treatment OAM" and > >> "Different-Forwarding-Treatment OAM" in this document. > >> Please let us know if you prefer otherwise. > >> > > > > Accepted. > > > >> > >> 7. For readability, may "forwarding (e.g., QoS) treatment" be > >> changed to "forwarding treatment (e.g., QoS)"? There are 4 > instances > >> in this document. For example: > >> > >> Original: > >> Equal-Forwarding-Treatment OAM: > >> The OAM packets receive the same forwarding (e.g., QoS) > treatment > >> as user data packets. > >> > >> Perhaps: > >> Equal-Forwarding-Treatment OAM: > >> The OAM packets receive the same forwarding treatment (e.g., > QoS) > >> as user data packets. > >> > > > > Yes, for all instances. > > > >> > >> 8. Section 3.4: To make it clear to the reader why the > definition of > >> "In-band OAM" is being quoted here, would you like to add a > sentence > >> (similar to that in Appendix A) here as well? > > > > Yes, pelase. > > > >> > >> In other words, the quote is from the definition for "In-band > OAM" > >> in Section 1.1 of [RFC9551], and the mapping is explained in > Appendix A: > >> The property of "Equal-Forwarding-Treatment" is referred to in > >> [RFC9551] as "In-band OAM". > >> > >> Original: > >> An example of "Equal-Forwarding-Treatment OAM" is presented in > >> [RFC9551] in the context of Deterministic Networking (DetNet) > OAM: > >> "it traverses the same set of links and interfaces receiving > the same > >> QoS and Packet Replication, Elimination, and Ordering > Functions > >> (PREOF) treatment as the monitored DetNet flow". > >> > >> > >> 9. For [P4-INT-2.1], may the provided URL be replaced? The URL > >> provided > >> > (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fp4 > >> .org%2Fp4- > spec%2Fdocs%2FINT_v2_1.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40oran > ge.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9 > 253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907233839%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey > JFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoi > TWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cC8POrpyw1p4yM6HUX4Fto > H%2FTtsOVI3%2BnrbzUnjFqnI%3D&reserved=0) is 404. We have found > the following URL, which appears to match the information in the > reference: > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > p4. > >> org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F53%2Fp4- > spec%2Fdocs%2FINT_v2_1.p > >> > df&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd > 53f > >> > 3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173 > 314 > >> > 907243533%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIw > LjA > >> > uMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7 > C%7 > >> > C&sdata=gOhIS9iSqJbU62YM%2F8zsY9wlSmvurm9s%2Bbsd2xKFGKc%3D&reserve > d=0 > >> Is this the correct updated URL? > > > > Correct. Please update the URL > > > >> > >> > >> 10. How may this be rephrased to avoid the repetition of > "similar > >> uses still use"? Does "documents" convey the intended meaning? > >> > >> Original: > >> Other similar uses, including [P4-INT-2.1], still use > >> variations of "in-band", "in band", or "inband". > >> > >> Perhaps: > >> Other similar documents, including [P4-INT-2.1], still use > >> variations of "in-band", "in band", or "inband". > >> > > > > Yes. > > > >> > >> 11. Does RFC 9912 (which was draft-ietf-raw-architecture) still > >> contain similar text? If not, please provide updated text. > >> (We were not able to identify the similar text.) > > > > Because of our review of the draft, that text was removed: > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > auth > > or-tools.ietf.org%2Fiddiff%3Furl1%3Ddraft-ietf-raw-architecture- > 26%26u > > rl2%3Ddraft-ietf-raw-architecture-27%26difftype%3D-- > html&data=05%7C02% > > > 7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4de > e%7C > > > 90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907253774%7CUn > know > > > n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOi > JXaW > > > 4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BOpMRn > hc1A > > iZu2vZD5zrBBuDs%2FIBoEf4rvoAAq0oszc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Please remove the sentence "[RFC9912] uses similar text.” And > associated reference. > > > >> > >> Current: > >> Similarly, the property of "Different- Forwarding-Treatment > OAM" > >> can be found in the following definition in > >> [RFC9551]: "Out-of-band OAM: an active OAM method whose path > through > >> the DetNet domain may not be topologically identical to the > path of > >> the monitored DetNet flow, its test packets may receive > different QoS > >> and/or PREOF treatment, or both." [RFC9912] uses similar text. > >> > >> > >> 12. Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the > online > >> Style Guide > >> > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fww > >> w.rfc- > editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language&data=05 > >> > %7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08dec > cbe > >> > 4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6391733149072643 > 72% > >> > 7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMC > IsI > >> > lAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata > =bn > >> 33Sb%2Fg%2Fy3yk%2BMJ42fsOMb9XMCJSSSfXyBl2wHcmX4%3D&reserved=0> > >> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this > nature > >> typically result in more precise language, which is helpful for > readers. > > > > No inclusive language concerns identified. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Carlos. > > > >> > >> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but > this > >> should still be reviewed as a best practice. > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Alice Russo > >> RFC Production Center > >> > >> > >> On Jun 12, 2026, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> *****IMPORTANT***** > >> > >> RFC Author(s): > >> -------------- > >> > >> Final Review for RFC-to-be 10014 > >> <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization> > >> > >> Your document is now available for Final Review (previously > AUTH48). > >> Once it has been reviewed and approved by you and all > coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. > >> If an author is no longer available, there are several > remedies; see > >> the Unavailable Authors section > >> > (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fauthors.ietf.org%2Frfc-publication-process%23unavailable- > authors&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4 > 054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0% > 7C639173314907275001%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd > WUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ% > 3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ANAk0sDlQaSijD9K2RbdXQgI11YL8jS6uCxkP5VO% > 2Fog%3D&reserved=0). > >> > >> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other > parties > >> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before > providing > >> your approval. > >> > >> Planning your review > >> --------------------- > >> > >> Please review the following aspects of your document: > >> > >> * RFC Editor questions > >> > >> Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC > Editor > >> that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as > >> follows: > >> > >> <!-- [rfced] ... --> > >> > >> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. > >> > >> * Changes submitted by coauthors > >> > >> Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your > >> coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you > agree to > >> changes submitted by your coauthors. > >> > >> * Content > >> > >> Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot > >> change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular > attention to: > >> - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) > >> - contact information > >> - references > >> > >> * Copyright notices and legends > >> > >> Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in > RFC > >> 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP – > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > trustee.ietf.org%2Flicense- > info&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054 > bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6 > 39173314907286712%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUs > IlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D% > 3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R%2Bdhml83e5MGE5Prqm37oYkkeoTz%2BziotUcSwKTO > KFk%3D&reserved=0). > >> > >> * Semantic markup > >> > >> Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that > elements of > >> content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that > <sourcecode> > >> and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at > >> > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fauthors.ietf.org%2Frfcxml- > vocabulary&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb2 > 8d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7 > C0%7C639173314907309914%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOn > RydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy > fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=V%2F3A4KEsG%2FHGFNKXyz1JWcenSJPqasNI4d > %2FgKjcGFBE%3D&reserved=0>. > >> > >> * Formatted output > >> > >> Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the > >> formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, > is > >> reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting > >> limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. > >> > >> > >> Submitting changes > >> ------------------ > >> > >> To submit changes, please reply to this email using 'REPLY ALL' > as > >> all the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. > The > >> parties > >> include: > >> > >> * your coauthors > >> > >> * [email protected] (the RPC team) > >> > >> * other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., > >> IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the > >> responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). > >> > >> * [email protected], which is an archival mailing > list > >> to preserve discussion about the document while in the RPC > editorial > >> queue; it is not an active discussion list: > >> > >> * More info: > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > mai > >> larchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fietf-announce%2Fyb6lpIGh- > 4Q9l2USxIAe > >> > 6P8O4Zc&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4 > 054 > >> > bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6 > 391 > >> > 73314907324367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlY > iOi > >> > IwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0 > %7C > >> > %7C%7C&sdata=ht0nkYQB%2BGCETYKX3pIGff0HYQ6p5zWTs3MYRR4veaI%3D&rese > rve > >> d=0 > >> > >> * The archive itself: > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > mai > >> > larchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fbrowse%2Fauth48archive%2F&data=05%7C02% > 7Cm > >> > ohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7 > C90 > >> > c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907339135%7CUnkn > own > >> > %7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJ > XaW > >> > 4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1OpDrFAh > yHQ > >> v%2BhTrzizOY%2Fz2nyq37IxXKDh%2Bzcl8LP4%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily > opt out > >> of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a > sensitive matter). > >> If needed, please add a note at the top of the message > that you > >> have dropped the address. When the discussion is > concluded, > >> [email protected] will be re-added to the CC > list and > >> its addition will be noted at the top of the message. > >> > >> You may submit your changes in one of two ways: > >> > >> An update to the provided XML file > >> — OR — > >> An explicit list of changes in this format > >> > >> Section # (or indicate Global) > >> > >> OLD: > >> old text > >> > >> NEW: > >> new text > >> > >> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an > >> explicit list of changes, as either form is sufficient. > >> > >> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes > that > >> seem beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, > deletion > >> of text, and technical changes. Information about stream > managers > >> can be found in the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require > approval from a stream manager. > >> > >> > >> Approving for publication > >> -------------------------- > >> > >> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email > >> stating that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use > 'REPLY > >> ALL', as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your > approval. > >> > >> > >> Files > >> ----- > >> > >> The files are available here: > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca > >> > dair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34 > b40 > >> > bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907354223%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG > Zsb > >> > 3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkF > OIj > >> > oiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FRjtkyl5leCxtN%2FD > CRn > >> Dowk9QPB5jYTmHB8xp0bM0W4%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouc > >> > adair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af3 > 4b4 > >> > 0bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907367428%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb > GZs > >> > b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIk > FOI > >> > joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=f%2B6w65O79KH39LR0g > chf > >> dphe29pgkyRo4Octq%2FoJV7U%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca > >> > dair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34 > b40 > >> > bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907378166%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG > Zsb > >> > 3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkF > OIj > >> > oiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pTcMt3N09y8YIJ3dNGz9 > yLJ > >> wdiA2wSUh%2Bl6Wu9O5YZg%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc- > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca > >> > dair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a20af34 > b40 > >> > bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907388305%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG > Zsb > >> > 3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkF > OIj > >> > oiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cszjRmfAfeBtFp3IX1%2 > BhN > >> MALESfT3lOxRlK7YOqAn18%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> Diff file of the text: > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed > >> > .boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a > 20a > >> > f34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907398641%7CUnknown%7C > TWF > >> > pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zM > iIs > >> > IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Iv4jo5%2F7tUCA > nTY > >> lQJIHUaq8zXrsLJtuoQhMQS9j9ek%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmoha > >> > med.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90 > c7a > >> > 20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907408790%7CUnknown > %7C > >> > TWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW > 4zM > >> > iIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MrLItgFLH7m > 5%2 > >> FaD8mu0UUa9kU7X87tF4MSuVgtvjwzs%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) > >> > >> Diff of the XML: > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > www > >> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc10014- > xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmoh > >> > amed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C9 > 0c7 > >> > a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907418905%7CUnknow > n%7 > >> > CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXa > W4z > >> > MiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=G%2Bmy%2FB > Hot > >> MDgEuJaYhw6UFr8EbG70ijPknhcCf1F6d8%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > >> Tracking progress > >> ----------------- > >> > >> Details on the status of your Final Review are here: > >> > >> > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > que > >> ue.rfc-editor.org%2Ffinal- > review%2Frfc10014%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed > >> > .boucadair%40orange.com%7C1018bb28d4054bd53f3e08deccbe4dee%7C90c7a > 20a > >> > f34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639173314907428552%7CUnknown%7C > TWF > >> > pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zM > iIs > >> > IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k%2Fhhxmz01B0A > 7lq > >> Jz1ljUyeyqCvex0Tnrhmx3gMPGi0%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> Please let us know if you have any questions. > >> > >> Thank you for your cooperation, > >> > >> RFC Editor > >> > >> -------------------------------------- > >> RFC 10014 (draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization) > >> > >> Title : Guidelines for Characterizing the Term "OAM" > >> Author(s) : C. Pignataro, > >> A. Farrel, > >> T. Mizrahi > >> WG Chair(s) : Joe Clarke, Benoît Claise > >> Area Director(s) : Mohamed Boucadair, Mahesh Jethanandani > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
