Yup, still approved. Thanks for checking. Adrian
-----Original Message----- From: Alice Russo <[email protected]> Sent: 18 June 2026 18:39 To: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>; Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Carlos Pignataro <[email protected]>; RFC Editor <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]>; auth48archive <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10014 (draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization) in XML Adrian, Tal, FYI, we assume your approvals still stand unless you let us know otherwise. This mail is because the changes applied to this document have been altered since you wrote that you approved it. The relevant files are available from the URLs below. Thank you. Alice Russo RFC Production Center > On Jun 18, 2026, at 9:56 AM, Alice Russo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Med, > > Thank you for your reply. The two SHOULDs have been restored. In addition, > the keywords paragraph has been added (as Section 1.1) and the references > added; they were not present in the approved I-D. > > This diff file shows only the most recent changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014-lastrfcdiff.html > > > For the rest of the files: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014.xml (source) > > This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10014-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > > Please let us know if you approve this document for publication or any > further changes are needed. > > Thank you. > > Alice Russo > RFC Production Center > >> On Jun 18, 2026, at 12:09 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hi Alice, all, >> >> I disapprove the changes of the normative language in Section 3.7. Please >> revert these changes and add relevant boilerplate. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Cheers, >> Med -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
