Hi Tobias, Thanks for the quick reply! All questions have now been addressed. We have marked your approval on the Final Review status page for this document (see https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc10001/).
We will wait for further updates and/or approval from Momoka, and we’ll send a separate email to the AD with changes that require approval. Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Jul 15, 2026, at 2:55 PM, Tobias Fiebig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rebecca, >> "Dual-stack name server” still only appears in Section 2. Is this >> okay, or are further updates needed? > > This is okay. > >> b) What do you think about the minor updates shown below (i.e., >> moving “now” and updating “frequent” to “common”)? >> >> Original: >> Yet, while it is observed that the first >> zones becoming exclusively IPv6 resolvable, there is still a major >> portion of zones solely relying on IPv4 [V6DNSRDY-23]. >> >> Current: >> Yet, while the first zones that are exclusively IPv6 resolvable >> can >> be observed by now, exclusively IPv4 resolvable zones are >> considerably more frequent [V6DNSRDY-23]. >> >> Perhaps: >> Yet, while the first zones that are exclusively IPv6 resolvable >> can >> now be observed, exclusively IPv4 resolvable zones are >> considerably more common [V6DNSRDY-23]. > > Thanks, 'Perhaps:' sounds like a good option. > >> c) In the updated text at the end of Section 4.3, should “address >> family based namespace fragmentation” be revised as follows to align >> with updates elsewhere in the document? That is, should this phrase >> be updated to use “name space” (two words), use “partitioning” rather >> than “fragmentation”, and recast to avoid awkward hyphenation? >> >> Current: >> If this is not done, a client might select a >> subset of recursive DNS servers that leads to address family based >> namespace fragmentation. >> >> Perhaps: >> If this is not done, a client might select a >> subset of recursive DNS servers that leads to name space >> partitioning due to >> IP address family support. > > Yes, thank you, this one slipped through. > >> d) FYI - Once we finalize the questions above, we’ll need to ask the >> AD to approve some changes that are “above editorial”. > > Thanks, and no worries. Please go ahead and reach out to the ADs. > > With best regards, > Tobias > > -- > My working day may not be your working day. Please do not feel obliged > to reply to my email outside of your normal working hours. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Tobias Fiebig, Forschungsgruppe Internet Architecture (INET) > Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Campus E14, 66123 Saarbrücken > E1 4 - Raum 517 mobil: +31 616 80 98 99 -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
