Lou Iorio wrote:
This is the first chapter I've reviewed for OO, so let me know if I've done to little or too much, or if I simply did something wrong. I found this document to be very well organized and written, and I didn't change much.
I think you did a good job. I'm relieved to see that you didn't make a lot of copy-editing changes, as that suggests the previous reviewers and editors did a good job. But you did catch a few things that we all missed, so that's good. BTW, the copyright statement is not to be changed at this point, as it is boilerplate for all the chapters and books. We can consider amending it for future editions, and I've added your suggestion to my enhancements list.
I spent most of my time checking the doc against OO 2.0. Nearly all was correct.
Great! That's what was needed most, the checking against OOo2.0.
I changed what I thought needed updating. My changes are visible.
Thank you. I'll update the chapter as soon as I can.
I should also say that I spent a lot of time using this document to learn the product, and in this regard, it worked very well for me.
This is one of several chapters that were written by a committee, so it's especially good to hear that it worked for you.
If what I've done is appropriate and useful, please let me know, and I'll review another chapter.
Yes and yes! Thanks again. Cheers, Jean
