I sent a reply to Janet's email, but after a few hours, it doesn't seem
to be making it to the list. Here it is again:
Janet M. Swisher wrote:
> When would it not be appropriate to mark the license clearly? Put
> another way, under what circumstances is the license not marked? Is
> the license ever marked "unclearly"?
I was thinking of the case where I put content in my home folder for
example, or instructions for managing Plone, which are really incidental
to the purpose of OOoAuthors.
> I suggest the following wording for what I think this is trying to
> say:
>
> "When a license is specified for documents in a particular folder,
> that license is noted in the folder. If no license is specified for
> a folder, either the license is specified in each document or normal
> copyrights apply."
Oh, perfect. Yes, that's much clearer. That's what I was thinking but
couldn't articulate. Now, would it be a good idea to change the last
sentence to this:
"If no license is specified for the folder, or in the document itself,
then normal copyrights apply."
Just making it a tad more compact.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
\/_/ I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
/