Yes I agree Jean there is a lot of material that needs to be covered that we left out in 2.x. I am sure we will find that converting the files to 3.x. :) So what do we need to do about the template issues? I would really hate to hold on Calc but if we need to then I can put that on the back burner and jump in somewhere else.
Linda On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Jean Hollis Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linda Worthington wrote: > >> Hello Shelagh, >> >> After reviewing the outline for Calc I see that the bulk of it has not >> been >> converted for review. Jean has three chapters ready for review and Andrew >> has a chapter on Macros as well ready for review. The rest of Calc has not >> been converted to 3.x from 2.x. It would be wonderful if you would like to >> help me convert the existing files so we can write any additional material >> needed to move the Calc Guide to 3.x. Just let me know what you are >> working >> on so I don't try to convert the same files. >> > > Linda, huge!! thanks for taking on the Calc Guide. > > The Calc Macros chapter has not been converted to the new template yet, so > I had not submitted it for review (even though Andrew had updated it). If > someone wants to convert it and review it, that's cool. Otherwise I will > convert it (probably this weekend) and then submit it for review. > > Chapters 1 and 2, although revised for V3, are not in the latest template > either. Chapter 5 should be. All need review because I rewrote them heavily > and added a lot of new material that wasn't in the V2 chapters. > > And as Linda says, the other chapters that were published for V2 need > conversion and review for V3. IMO several of them need a lot of additional > material (stuff that never got into the V2 chapters) as well as any updates > to V3. > > --Jean >
