Ah! Yes, I see. Good idea, Leo. Excellent idea, in fact. We should probably
adopt that too. Thank you!
(Your explanation was clear. I was reading too quickly. It's too early in the
morning here.)
--Jean
Leo Moons wrote:
Hello Jean,
Maybe I was not so clear in my explanation, we do apply also the naming
convention, but above that I mention the date in the titles on the website.
Best regards
Leo
Jean Hollis Weber schreef:
Leo Moons wrote:
Hello Jean,
I'll answer your other question later, after I check to make sure
what the latest version of that file is. We can't go by the "last
modified" date shown on the website for a lot of the files, because
those are often the dates on which they were migrated to the new
website, not the actual date of modification. (As if there weren't
enough other things to confuse everyone!)
I add the date in the title in order to know when it was last
updated, as you can see here:
http://www.oooauthors.org/netherland/Handl3.x/inleidende-gids/Gepubliceerde_hoofdstukken_IG_3.x_PDF
Thanks, Leo. The naming convention for the English guides requires
that, and most people do that. Unfortunately, the specific file that
Stephen mentioned, and some others, were not named that way.
Also, newbies often don't know to look at the file name, not the "last
modified"
date on the website.
--Jean
