Peter Bunclark wrote:
>
> Isn't it really the case that a text file is not a map, it is one of the
> sources for a map. The actual automounter map is the parsed concatenation
> of all input sources, with `+' being a directive to tell the parser
> how to proceed during the input processs?
>
This is, still, though, a reasonable idea for how to implement this,
*besides* the obvious problem that there is no real way to distinguish
between YP and NIS+ (which one are you asking for, here?) that I know
of.
In technical terms, this would involve lookup_file calling lookup_yp or
lookup_nisplus on failure. It would also involve substantial overhead
over the normal operation in either case.
-hpa
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Stefan Monnier
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Camm Maguire
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Stefan Monnier
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- with or without `head' (was Re: auto_ -> auto. in init ... Scott McDermott
- Re: with or without `head' (was Re: auto_ -> auto. in i... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: with or without `head' (was Re: auto_ -> auto. in i... Camm Maguire
- Re: with or without `head' (was Re: auto_ -> auto. in i... Camm Maguire
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Scott McDermott
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Scott McDermott
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
